Armando Coronado-Ferra v. Eric Holder, Jr.

437 F. App'x 546
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 8, 2011·No. 10-70639·Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Armando Coronado-Ferra, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of *547 law, Castillo-Cruz v. Holder, 581 F.3d 1154, 1158-59 (9th Cir.2009), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA properly applied the modified categorical approach in determining that Coronado-Ferra’s 2008 conviction under CaLPenal Code § 666 was a generic theft offense within the meaning of 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(G) where the record of conviction establishes that he was not convicted of theft by false pretenses. See Carrillo-Jaime v. Holder, 572 F.3d 747, 751-53 (9th Cir.2009). Coronado-Ferra is therefore removable as an aggravated felon under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(A)(iii) and ineligible for cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a)(3).

In light of our disposition, we need not reach his remaining contention.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Armando Coronado-Ferra v. Eric Holder, Jr., 437 F. App'x 546 (9th Cir. 2011).

437 F. App'x 546 (Armando Coronado-Ferra v. Eric Holder, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castillo-Cruz v. Holder
581 F.3d 1154 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)
Carrillo-Jaime v. Holder
572 F.3d 747 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)