Armando Coronado-Ferra v. Eric Holder, Jr.
This text of 437 F. App'x 546 (Armando Coronado-Ferra v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Armando Coronado-Ferra, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of *547 law, Castillo-Cruz v. Holder, 581 F.3d 1154, 1158-59 (9th Cir.2009), and we deny the petition for review.
The BIA properly applied the modified categorical approach in determining that Coronado-Ferra’s 2008 conviction under CaLPenal Code § 666 was a generic theft offense within the meaning of 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(G) where the record of conviction establishes that he was not convicted of theft by false pretenses. See Carrillo-Jaime v. Holder, 572 F.3d 747, 751-53 (9th Cir.2009). Coronado-Ferra is therefore removable as an aggravated felon under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(A)(iii) and ineligible for cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a)(3).
In light of our disposition, we need not reach his remaining contention.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
437 F. App'x 546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armando-coronado-ferra-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2011.