Armando C. Santana v. Dany Yamile Taborda-Cortes
This text of Armando C. Santana v. Dany Yamile Taborda-Cortes (Armando C. Santana v. Dany Yamile Taborda-Cortes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
ARMANDO C. SANTANA, Appellant,
v.
DANY YAMILE TABORDA-CORTES, Appellee.
No. 4D2024-2937
[January 7, 2026]
Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Allison Gilman, Judge; L.T. Case No. COSO23005326.
Armando C. Santana, Miramar, pro se.
Wayne S. Kramer of Midler & Kramer, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
SHEPHERD, J.
Appellant challenges the dismissal with prejudice of his fourth amended complaint for lack of standing and the trial court’s denial of non- party Santana Homes Corp.’s motion for leave to amend. We affirm both rulings without discussion.
Appellant also seeks review of a nonfinal order determining Appellee’s entitlement to attorney’s fees. We dismiss that portion of the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Dania Beach Boat Club Condo. Ass’n, Inc. v. Forcier, 290 So. 3d 99, 102 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020).
Affirmed in part; dismissed in part.
GROSS and FORST, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Armando C. Santana v. Dany Yamile Taborda-Cortes, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armando-c-santana-v-dany-yamile-taborda-cortes-fladistctapp-2026.