Armando Arce v. Jennifer Arce
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2025-1404 _____________________________
ARMANDO ARCE,
Petitioner,
v.
JENNIFER ARCE,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.
August 26, 2025
PER CURIAM.
DENIED.
The Court warns Petitioner that future filings that this Court determines to be frivolous may result in the imposition of sanctions, including limitation or prohibition against further filings in this Court unless filed on Petitioner’s behalf by an attorney licensed to practice in the State of Florida.
KELSEY, LONG, and TREADWELL, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Armando Arce, pro se, Petitioner.
No appearance for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Armando Arce v. Jennifer Arce (Armando Arce v. Jennifer Arce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.