Armando Amado v. Microsoft Corp.
This text of 185 F. App'x 953 (Armando Amado v. Microsoft Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have considered the various contentions of the appeal and cross-appeal, and we affirm in all respects. However, in affirming, we wish to make clear that we do not read the district court’s August 2, 2005, order — requiring the creation of an escrow account as a condition of the stay of the permanent injunction — as having determined the ultimate disposition of the funds required to be deposited in the escrow account. When the district court makes that determination, any party believing itself aggrieved by that order may appeal to this court.
No costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
185 F. App'x 953, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armando-amado-v-microsoft-corp-cafc-2006.