Armando Amado v. Microsoft Corp.

Federal Circuit

Armando Amado v. Microsoft Corp.

185 F. App'x 953

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided June 14, 2006·No. Nos. 05-1531, 05-1581·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have considered the various contentions of the appeal and cross-appeal, and we affirm in all respects. However, in affirming, we wish to make clear that we do not read the district court’s August 2, 2005, order — requiring the creation of an escrow account as a condition of the stay of the permanent injunction — as having determined the ultimate disposition of the funds required to be deposited in the escrow account. When the district court makes that determination, any party believing itself aggrieved by that order may appeal to this court.

No costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have considered the various contentions of the appeal and cross-appeal, and we affirm in all respects. However, in affirming, we wish to make clear that we do not read the district court’s August 2, 2005, order — requiring the creation of an escrow account as a condition of the stay of the permanent injunction — as having determined the ultimate disposition of the funds required to be deposited in the escrow account. When the district court makes that determination, any party believing itself aggrieved by that order may appeal to this court.

No costs.

Armando Amado v. Microsoft Corp., 185 F. App'x 953 (Fed. Cir. 2006).

Pincite

185 F. App'x 953 (Armando Amado v. Microsoft Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related