Armadeni v. Tejedo

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Armadeni v. Tejedo

700 So. 2d 416, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10720, 1997 WL 587053

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 24, 1997

DocketNo. 96-3149

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 700 So. 2d 416 (Armadeni v. Tejedo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Armadeni v. Tejedo, 700 So. 2d 416, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10720, 1997 WL 587053 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the summary judgment entered in favor of the appellee. A genuine issue of material fact exists as to the date the appellant knew or should have known of the existence of the fraudulent concealment action, and thus summary judgment is precluded. See Nardone v. Reynolds, 333 So.2d 25 (Fla.1976); Brugiere v. Credit Commerciale France, 679 So.2d 875 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Grossman v. Greenberg, 619 So.2d 406 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 629 So.2d 133 (Fla. 1993).

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the summary judgment entered in favor of the appellee. A genuine issue of material fact exists as to the date the appellant knew or should have known of the existence of the fraudulent concealment action, and thus summary judgment is precluded. See Nardone v. Reynolds, 333 So.2d 25 (Fla.1976); Brugiere v. Credit Commerciale France, 679 So.2d 875 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Grossman v. Greenberg, 619 So.2d 406 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 629 So.2d 133 (Fla. 1993).

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

700 So. 2d 416, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10720, 1997 WL 587053, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armadeni-v-tejedo-fladistctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack