Arlo Barger v. Bill R. Story, Warden

803 F.2d 718, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 31149, 1986 WL 17818
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 23, 1986
Docket86-5604
StatusUnpublished

This text of 803 F.2d 718 (Arlo Barger v. Bill R. Story, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arlo Barger v. Bill R. Story, Warden, 803 F.2d 718, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 31149, 1986 WL 17818 (6th Cir. 1986).

Opinion

803 F.2d 718

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
ARLO BARGER, Petitioner-Appellant
v.
BILL R. STORY, WARDEN, ET AL., Respondents-Appellees.

No. 86-5604.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Sept. 23, 1986.

BEFORE: MARTIN, MILBURN and BOGGS, Circuit Judges

ORDER

The petitioner moves for counsel and the respondents move to dismiss this appeal from the district court's order denying the petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner was incarcerated at the federal prison in Ashland, Kentucky. His petition alleged that he was entitled to immediate release to a halfway house in Cincinnati, Ohio, but this release was delayed because of budgetary problems created by the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act. The district court found that the petitioner had no liberty interest in placement at the halfway house; so the court denied the petition.

Accompanying the respondents' motion to dismiss is an affidavit stating that the petitioner has now been released to the halfway house in Cincinnati, Ohio. Because this release was the only relief requested by the petitioner, the case is now moot. LoCicero v. Day, 518 F.2d 783, 785 (6th Cir. 1975) (per curiam).

The appeal is dismissed as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
803 F.2d 718, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 31149, 1986 WL 17818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arlo-barger-v-bill-r-story-warden-ca6-1986.