Arliss v. Browar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Arliss v. Browar

223 A.D.2d 569, 637 N.Y.S.2d 309, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 226

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 16, 1996·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover monies due on an oral loan agreement, [570]*570the defendant Frances Browarsky appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Milano, J.) dated October 24, 1994, which denied her motion to vacate a judgment of the same court, dated September 1,1994, entered upon her default.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The appellant failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for her default and a meritorious defense to the action (see, Fennell v Mason, 204 AD2d 599; Putney v Pearlman, 203 AD2d 333). Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover monies due on an oral loan agreement, [570]*570the defendant Frances Browarsky appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Milano, J.) dated October 24, 1994, which denied her motion to vacate a judgment of the same court, dated September 1,1994, entered upon her default.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The appellant failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for her default and a meritorious defense to the action (see, Fennell v Mason, 204 AD2d 599; Putney v Pearlman, 203 AD2d 333). Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Arliss v. Browar, 223 A.D.2d 569, 637 N.Y.S.2d 309, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 226 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

223 A.D.2d 569 (Arliss v. Browar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related