Arliss v. Browar
This text of 223 A.D.2d 569 (Arliss v. Browar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover monies due on an oral loan agreement, [570]*570the defendant Frances Browarsky appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Milano, J.) dated October 24, 1994, which denied her motion to vacate a judgment of the same court, dated September 1,1994, entered upon her default.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The appellant failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for her default and a meritorious defense to the action (see, Fennell v Mason, 204 AD2d 599; Putney v Pearlman, 203 AD2d 333). Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
223 A.D.2d 569, 637 N.Y.S.2d 309, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arliss-v-browar-nyappdiv-1996.