Arlington Mfg. Co. v. Celluloid Co.

97 F. 91, 38 C.C.A. 60, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 2575
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedSeptember 22, 1899
DocketNo. 30
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 97 F. 91 (Arlington Mfg. Co. v. Celluloid Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arlington Mfg. Co. v. Celluloid Co., 97 F. 91, 38 C.C.A. 60, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 2575 (3d Cir. 1899).

Opinion

BRADFORD, District Judge.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory decree sustaining letters patent No. 546,360, issued September 17, 1895, to Stevens & Harrison, and No. 542,452, issued July 9, 1895, to Thurber & Schaefer. Both patents are owned by the appellee. The defenses are lack of novelty and of invention and non-infringement. This appeal has twice been argued, by reason of the retirement of Judge Butler from the bench after the first hearing and before a conclusion was reached as to the disposition of the case.

The claims of patent No. 546,360 are as follows:

“1. The method of producing a pyroxyline compound in imitation of onyx, consisting, first, in forming the light-tinted parts in solidified strata; second, cutting through these strata across their edges; third, inserting coloring matter between the cut parts, and, fourth, solidifying the whole into blocks, shapes or masses, substantially as described.
2. The method of producing a pyroxyline compound in imitation of onyx, consisting, first, In forming the light-tinted parts in solidified strata; second, cutting through these strata across their edges; third, inserting a pyroxyline composition of a different color between the cut parts, and, fourth, solidifying the whole into blocks, shapes or masses, substantially as described.
3. A pyroxyline compound in imitation of onyx, consisting of two or more light tints in solidified strata with lines of a different color breaking through or crossing the edges of these light-tinted strata, substantially as described.
4. A rod or sheet of pyroxyline composition in imitation of onyx, consisting 'of two or more light tints with streaks of a darker color breaking through or interspersed with the lighter tints, substantially as described.”

This patent cannot be sustained on the ground merely that the production of a pyroxyline compound in imitation of onyx or its production in the manner described in the specification was novel. It is necessary that such production should also have involved invention. As was said in Thompson v. Boisselier, 114 U. S. 1, 11, 5 Sup. Ct. 1047:

“It is not enough that a thing shall be new, in the sense that in the shape or form in which it is produced it shall not have been before known, and that it shall be useful, but it must, under the constitution and the statute, amount to an invention or discovery.”

The properties and characteristics of celluloid and other pyroxyline compounds were understood long before the date of the alleged invention. It was known that they could be rendered plastic by heat and when in that condition moulded or pressed into such shapes or forms as might be desired. It was also known that by the introduction of coloring matter different colors or tints could be imparted to the finished product and that by subjecting, while plastic, two or more sheets o^ nieces of celluloid different in color or tint to a rolling or other kneading or mixing process the different colors or tints-[93]*93could be blended in sueli manner in tbe finished product as to present a variegated, veined, mottled or clouded appearance, and cause such product to imitate a variety of natural objects or substances. Indeed in tbe specification of tbe patent it is said:

“Solid or massive pyroxyline compounds, as is well known, owe their commercial importance largely to their susceptibility to coloring treatment and .manipulations essential to the production of imitaiious of natural substances— like mottled amber, tortoise-shell, veined ivory, carnelian, &e. * * * Methods of coloring the pyroxyline compositions used are well known and it is unnecessary to describe the coloring-matter or pigments used.”

In view of the prior state of tbe art as disclosed in the record, we do not think that either the production or the method of production of the onyx base involved invention, but rather the exercise of judgment ami skill in the selection and combination of colors and in the regulation of tbe amount of rolling or kneading which the plastic celluloid should undergo in order to effect the desired blending of tints and shades. Was there patentable novelty or invention in the cutting of the layers or strata of the celluloid and the insertion between the cut parts of coloring matter for the imitation of the streaks or veins of the natural onyx? It appears that the complainant and its predecessor, The Celluloid Manufacturing Company, as early as 1884 manufactured and have since continued to manufacture from celluloid imitation agate and carnelian by the method described and claimed in the France application for a patent for “Iinjirovements in Manufacture of Pyroxyline Compounds, such as Pyralin, Celluloid, etc.” We quote from the application as follows:

“Tn practicing this invention I adopt the following’ method, susceptible of infinite variation, of extreme simplicity, and by which every possible form of agate may be Imitated with great accuracy. I first prepare sheets of two colors, mottled in the manner commonly used in known processes for imitating gray agate, a description of which will fully explain my invention as applied to all. When sufficient sheeting is prepared to form a cake the sheets are placed one upon another, and to the upper side of every alt.erna.te sheet a thin veneer is applied, said veneer being formed from a thin, transparent sheet, suitably colored. The color in the present instance is of the kind known as ‘ruby.’ The veneer is attached to the sheet by passing them together between the calendering rolls. The sheets, are then cut up into strips, each of the latter measuring about two inches from top to bottom. Being cut from the flat side of the sheet they are easily manipulated and bent to any desired shape. They are theD ‘laid up’ in the press, the strips having veneer attached being so placed that the' veneer sheet rests on its edge, and with substantially equal intervals between the veneers. When the cake is formed the finished sheets are cut, or planed, from the top of the cake, so that the sheets of veneer will appear therein as fine lines, or bands, of color running across the face of the sheet. The strips may be laid in various ways, and with the veneer at any distance apart, so that a great variety of novel effects may be produced. * * * I have stated that the sheets are cut into strips of about two inches from top to bottom, these being laid up in the press to form a cake, strips having veneer attached being inserted at regular intervals. It should be mentioned that the thickness and width of these strips are matters which are left to the judgment and taste of the manipulator, as they are capable of an infinite variation without departing from my invention. * 0 v What I claim is—
1. The method described for manufacturing pyroxyline compounds in imitation of agate and similar minerals, said method consisting in forming sheets of said compounds of suitable colors and mottling, attaching a colored veneer to the upper face of the upper sheets, cutting said sheets in strips, laying up said strips in the press with the veneers upon their edges and at suitable in[94]*94tervals, pressing the whole into a cake and cutting, or planing the finished sheets from said cake, substantially as described.
2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Foss v. Oglesby
127 F.2d 312 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1942)
Swan v. Thompson
80 F.2d 374 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1936)
In re Braselton
273 F. 759 (District of Columbia, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 F. 91, 38 C.C.A. 60, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 2575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arlington-mfg-co-v-celluloid-co-ca3-1899.