Arline v. Wometco Enterprises, Inc.

429 So. 2d 63, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20792
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 5, 1983
DocketNo. 82-824
StatusPublished

This text of 429 So. 2d 63 (Arline v. Wometco Enterprises, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arline v. Wometco Enterprises, Inc., 429 So. 2d 63, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20792 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order under review, which merely grants a motion for summary judgment, is non-appealable. The appeal is therefore dismissed. Having considered the merits, however, we observe by way of dictum, as we did in Kessler v. Gumenick, 358 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), that a final summary judgment would have been affirmed. Hilgenhurst v. Knight-Ridder Newspaper, Inc., 400 So.2d 523 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), rev. denied, 411 So.2d 382 (Fla.1981); Alvarez v. Metropolitan Dade County, 378 So.2d 1317 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Wometco Theatres Corp. v. Rath, 123 So.2d 472 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960); Zamora v. Columbia Broadcasting System, 480 F.Supp. 199 (S.D.Fla.1979).

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zamora v. Columbia Broadcasting System
480 F. Supp. 199 (S.D. Florida, 1979)
Wometco Theatres Corporation v. Rath
123 So. 2d 472 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)
Hilgenhurst v. Knight-Ridder Newspaper, Inc.
400 So. 2d 523 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Kessler v. Gumenick
358 So. 2d 1167 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Alvarez v. METROPOLITAN DADE CTY.
378 So. 2d 1317 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
429 So. 2d 63, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arline-v-wometco-enterprises-inc-fladistctapp-1983.