Arline v. State
434 So. 2d 907, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 22143
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 30, 1981
DocketNo. 80-1665
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 434 So. 2d 907 (Arline v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Arline v. State, 434 So. 2d 907, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 22143 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).
Opinion
We affirm the judgment and sentence. However, we remand for clarification of the order relating to the trial judge’s statement that he retained jurisdiction on the sexual battery charge, inasmuch as he did not state with individual particularity the basis for retaining such jurisdiction as is required by section 947.16(3), Florida Statutes (1979).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ragen v. Paramount Hudson, Inc.
434 So. 2d 907 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
434 So. 2d 907, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 22143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arline-v-state-fladistctapp-1981.