Arline v. State

434 So. 2d 907, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 22143
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 30, 1981·No. No. 80-1665·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment and sentence. However, we remand for clarification of the order relating to the trial judge’s statement that he retained jurisdiction on the sexual battery charge, inasmuch as he did not state with individual particularity the basis for retaining such jurisdiction as is required by section 947.16(3), Florida Statutes (1979).

SCHEB, C.J., and DANAHY and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arline v. State, 434 So. 2d 907, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 22143 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

434 So. 2d 907 (Arline v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ragen v. Paramount Hudson, Inc.
434 So. 2d 907 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)