Arline v. State
434 So. 2d 907, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 22143
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 30, 1981·No. No. 80-1665·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the judgment and sentence. However, we remand for clarification of the order relating to the trial judge’s statement that he retained jurisdiction on the sexual battery charge, inasmuch as he did not state with individual particularity the basis for retaining such jurisdiction as is required by section 947.16(3), Florida Statutes (1979).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Arline v. State, 434 So. 2d 907, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 22143 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).
434 So. 2d 907 (Arline v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ragen v. Paramount Hudson, Inc.
434 So. 2d 907 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)