Arlie Barker v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor Cedar Coal Company

Fourth Circuit

Arlie Barker v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor Cedar Coal Company

60 F.3d 820, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24741, 1995 WL 386788

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 30, 1995

Docket94-1768

StatusPublished

This text of 60 F.3d 820 (Arlie Barker v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor Cedar Coal Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arlie Barker v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor Cedar Coal Company, 60 F.3d 820, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24741, 1995 WL 386788 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

60 F.3d 820
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Arlie BARKER, Petitioner,
v.
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, United
States Department of Labor; Cedar Coal Company,
Respondents.

No. 94-1768.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

June 30, 1995.

Arlie Barker, Petitioner Pro Se.

C. William Mangum and Christian P. Barber, Washington, DC

William J. Evans, Salt Lake City, UT

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order and order on reconsideration affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. Secs. 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp.1994). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Barker v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, Nos. 92-145-BLA; 92-145-BLA-A (B.R.B. May 9, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

60 F.3d 820
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Arlie BARKER, Petitioner,
v.
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, United
States Department of Labor; Cedar Coal Company,
Respondents.

No. 94-1768.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

June 30, 1995.

Arlie Barker, Petitioner Pro Se.

C. William Mangum and Christian P. Barber, Washington, DC

William J. Evans, Salt Lake City, UT

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order and order on reconsideration affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. Secs. 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp.1994). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Barker v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, Nos. 92-145-BLA; 92-145-BLA-A (B.R.B. May 9, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 F.3d 820, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24741, 1995 WL 386788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arlie-barker-v-director-office-of-workers-compensa-ca4-1995.