Arlet, R. v. WCAB (L&I)
This text of Arlet, R. v. WCAB (L&I) (Arlet, R. v. WCAB (L&I)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
ROBERT ARLET, : No. 262 WAL 2020 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v. : Commonwealth Court : : WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL : BOARD (COMMONWEALTH OF : PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF : LABOR AND INDUSTRY, BUREAU OF : WORKERS' COMPENSATION), : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 26th day of May, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
Did the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania err as a matter of law in its July 29, 2020 Opinion and Order when it affirmed the W[orkers’ Compensation Appeal Board]’s finding that Acadia [Insurance Company] did not have a right of subrogation for benefits paid to [Petitioner] under a Jones Act[1] policy of insurance, despite the Commonwealth Court’s initial holding in this case that [Petitioner] was not a seaman and/or crew member entitled to the benefits which Acadia should not have paid him?
1 Section 33 of the Merchant Marine Act of 1920, 46 U.S.C. § 688.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Arlet, R. v. WCAB (L&I), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arlet-r-v-wcab-li-pa-2021.