Arles v. Burford

1951 OK CR 168, 239 P.2d 526, 95 Okla. Crim. 51, 1951 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 198
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedDecember 26, 1951
DocketNo. A-11578
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 1951 OK CR 168 (Arles v. Burford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arles v. Burford, 1951 OK CR 168, 239 P.2d 526, 95 Okla. Crim. 51, 1951 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 198 (Okla. Ct. App. 1951).

Opinion

JONES, J.

This is an original action in habeas corpus by the petitioner, R. L. Arles, who seeks to secure his release from confinement in the penitentiary.

The writ of habeas corpus is denied for these reasons:

First. The petition is unverified.

Second. The sufficiency of the information is challenged and a certified copy of the information is not attached to petition so that the court may determine its sufficiency.

Third. Habeas corpus may not be substituted for appeal.

BRETT, P. J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Best v. State
1964 OK CR 45 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1964)
Ex Parte Beard
1953 OK CR 173 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1953)
Horton v. Waters
1952 OK CR 17 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1951 OK CR 168, 239 P.2d 526, 95 Okla. Crim. 51, 1951 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arles-v-burford-oklacrimapp-1951.