ARLENE PREUDHOMME v. GARTH F. BAILEY
This text of ARLENE PREUDHOMME v. GARTH F. BAILEY (ARLENE PREUDHOMME v. GARTH F. BAILEY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
ARLENE PREUDHOMME, on behalf of AIDAN BAILEY and DILLAN BAILEY, Appellant,
v.
GARTH F. BAILEY, Appellee.
No. 4D19-1397
[March 19, 2020]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Andrea Ruth Gundersen, Judge; L.T. Case No. 18-8018 DVCE (58).
Arlene Preudhomme, Pembroke Pines, pro se.
No brief filed on behalf of appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
LEVINE, C.J., CIKLIN and GERBER, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ARLENE PREUDHOMME v. GARTH F. BAILEY, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arlene-preudhomme-v-garth-f-bailey-fladistctapp-2020.