Arlene Martinez v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 15, 2011·No. 04-11-00291-CR·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-11-00291-CR

Arlene MARTINEZ, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2010CR4426 Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebecca Simmons, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 15, 2011

DISMISSED

The trial court’s certification in this appeal states that the case is a “plea-bargain case, and

the defendant has NO right of appeal.” We must dismiss the appeal “if a certification that shows

the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” TEX. R. APP. P.

25.2(d); Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 613 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

Appellant’s counsel has filed written notice with this court that counsel has reviewed the

record and “can find no right of appeal for Appellant.” We construe this notice as an indication 04-11-00291-CR

that appellant will not seek to file an amended trial court certification showing that appellant has

the right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d) 37.1; see also Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174,

177 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, no pet.). In light of the record presented, we agree with

appellant’s counsel that Rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss this appeal. Accordingly, this

appeal is dismissed.

DO NOT PUBLISH

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arlene Martinez v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Arlene Martinez v. State (Arlene Martinez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dears v. State
154 S.W.3d 610 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Daniels v. State
110 S.W.3d 174 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)