Arlen Realty & Development Corp. v. Board of Assessors

74 A.D.2d 905, 425 N.Y.S.2d 855, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10704
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 24, 1980
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 74 A.D.2d 905 (Arlen Realty & Development Corp. v. Board of Assessors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arlen Realty & Development Corp. v. Board of Assessors, 74 A.D.2d 905, 425 N.Y.S.2d 855, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10704 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to article 7 of the Real Property Tax Law to review an assessed valuation of certain real property, petitioner appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated June 27, 1978, which dismissed its petition on the ground that it was not the "person aggrieved” and (2) as limited by its brief, from so much of a further order of the same court, dated October 13, 1978, as, upon granting renewal, adhered to its original determination and denied its motion to substitute or include an additional petitioner. Appeal from order dated June 27, 1978 dismissed as academic. That order was superseded by the order granting renewal. Order dated October 13, 1978 reversed insofar as appealed from, order dated June 27, 1978 vacated, petition reinstated and application to substitute or include an additional petitioner granted. Petitioner is awarded one bill of $50 costs and disbursements to cover both appeals. Both petitioner and its attorney had authority to act as agent for petitioner’s wholly owned and controlled subsidiary, which, as a lessee, is clearly an "aggrieved party” (see Matter of Burke, 62 NY 224; Real Property Tax Law, § 704, subd 1). Therefore, Special Term erred in not granting leave to petitioner to amend its caption pursuant to CPLR 3025 (subd [b]) (see People ex rel. Durham Realty Corp. v Cantor, 234 NY 507). Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Gibbons and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Waldbaum, Inc. v. Finance Administrator
542 N.E.2d 1078 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)
Village Supermarkets, Inc. v. Township of West Orange
525 A.2d 323 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1987)
Waldbaum, Inc. v. Finance Administrator
132 Misc. 2d 364 (New York Supreme Court, 1986)
Big "V" Supermarkets, Inc. v. Assessor of Town of East Greenbush
114 A.D.2d 726 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Pass & Seymour, Inc. v. Town of Geddes
126 Misc. 2d 805 (New York Supreme Court, 1984)
Ames Department Stores v. Assessor of Town of Concord
102 A.D.2d 9 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 A.D.2d 905, 425 N.Y.S.2d 855, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10704, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arlen-realty-development-corp-v-board-of-assessors-nyappdiv-1980.