Arledge v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Arledge v. State

123 So. 923, 23 Ala. App. 602

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided June 18, 1929·No. 5 Div. 739.·Published

Opinion

*603 BRICKEN, P. J.

There was a general verdict of guilty rendered by the jury against this appellant, who was tried upon an indictment which charged him with the offenses of distilling, etc., prohibited liquors, and of the unlawful possession of a still, to be used for that purpose. The defendant appealed to this court. The appeal is upon the record proper, there being no bill of exceptions. The record is regular,, and the judgment of conviction will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*603 BRICKEN, P. J.

There was a general verdict of guilty rendered by the jury against this appellant, who was tried upon an indictment which charged him with the offenses of distilling, etc., prohibited liquors, and of the unlawful possession of a still, to be used for that purpose. The defendant appealed to this court. The appeal is upon the record proper, there being no bill of exceptions. The record is regular,, and the judgment of conviction will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Arledge v. State, 123 So. 923, 23 Ala. App. 602 (Ala. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

123 So. 923 (Arledge v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.