Arlander Petty, Penn Central Company, and Clark Equipment Company

438 F.2d 538, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11902
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedFebruary 10, 1971
Docket35349
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 438 F.2d 538 (Arlander Petty, Penn Central Company, and Clark Equipment Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arlander Petty, Penn Central Company, and Clark Equipment Company, 438 F.2d 538, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11902 (2d Cir. 1971).

Opinion

438 F.2d 538

Arlander PETTY, Plaintiff, PENN CENTRAL COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee, and
Clark Equipment Company, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 493.

Docket 35349.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued February 8, 1971.

Decided February 10, 1971.

Appellant seeks reversal of judgment order, United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, 322 F.Supp. 1324, Thomas F. Croake, J., holding it liable as third party defendant as fully indemnitor of defendant-appellee, New York Central Railroad, for injuries suffered by railroad employee while operator of appellant's equipment.

Jerome H. Shapiro, Henry W. Herbert, Thomas J. Smith, New York City, for defendant-appellee.

John Nielsen, Tidal B. Henry, Jr., Fogarty & Nielsen, New York City, for defendant-appellant.

Before WATERMAN and FRIENDLY, Circuit Judges, and McLEAN, District Judge.*

PER CURIAM:

One Arlander Petty, an employee of the New York Central Railroad, was found to be entitled under the Federal Employers Liability Act to damages against the Railroad for injuries suffered by him in the course of his employment. Petty was a fork lift operator and was injured when the boom of the machine collapsed upon him. It was owned by Clark Equipment Company which leased it to the Railroad.

The Railroad had timely filed a cross-claim for indemnity against Clark. This cross-claim was heard by Judge Croake below, who granted it in its entirety and filed a written unreported memorandum opinion.

We affirm the judgment below upon the opinion of Judge Croake.

Notes:

*

Sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States of America, and v. James Gilbert Hays
438 F.2d 538 (Ninth Circuit, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
438 F.2d 538, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arlander-petty-penn-central-company-and-clark-equipment-company-ca2-1971.