Arkoh v. Navarro
This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 2440 (Arkoh v. Navarro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| Arkoh v Navarro |
| 2018 NY Slip Op 02440 |
| Decided on April 10, 2018 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on April 10, 2018
Renwick, J.P., Mazzarelli, Kahn, Gesmer, Kern, JJ.
6254N 304260/14
v
Felix Navarro III, et al., Defendants-Respondents.
Law Offices of Alexander Bespechny, Bronx (Louis Badolato of counsel), for appellant.
Appeal from order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Laura G. Douglas, J.), entered January 6, 2017, which, insofar as appealed from, purportedly granted defendants' motion to compel plaintiff to provide access to his Facebook account, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken by a nonaggrieved party.
A reading of the entire order appealed from makes clear that the motion court denied so much of defendants' motion as sought access to plaintiff's Facebook account. As a result, plaintiff
was not aggrieved by the order, and therefore has no standing to appeal (see CPLR 5511).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: APRIL 10, 2018
CLERK
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2018 NY Slip Op 2440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arkoh-v-navarro-nyappdiv-2018.