Arklay S. Richards Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Arklay S. Richards Co. v. United States

55 Cust. Ct. 516, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1537

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedDecember 13, 1965

DocketNo. 69688; protest 62/11904 (Boston)

StatusPublished

This text of 55 Cust. Ct. 516 (Arklay S. Richards Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arklay S. Richards Co. v. United States, 55 Cust. Ct. 516, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1537 (cusc 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of porcelain thermocouple tubes and that the involved articles are not chemical porcelain ware but are, in fact, articles in chief value [517]*517of earthy or mineral substances, not decorated or commercially susceptible of decoration in any manner, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. John H. Faunae, Philadelphia, Inc. v. United States (42 Cust. Ct. 196, C.D. 2085), followed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of porcelain thermocouple tubes and that the involved articles are not chemical porcelain ware but are, in fact, articles in chief value [517]*517of earthy or mineral substances, not decorated or commercially susceptible of decoration in any manner, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. John H. Faunae, Philadelphia, Inc. v. United States (42 Cust. Ct. 196, C.D. 2085), followed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 Cust. Ct. 516, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1537, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arklay-s-richards-co-v-united-states-cusc-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack