Arklay S. Richards Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Arklay S. Richards Co. v. United States

55 Cust. Ct. 516, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1537

United States Customs Court·Decided December 13, 1965·No. No. 69688; protest 62/11904 (Boston)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of porcelain thermocouple tubes and that the involved articles are not chemical porcelain ware but are, in fact, articles in chief value [517]*517of earthy or mineral substances, not decorated or commercially susceptible of decoration in any manner, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. John H. Faunae, Philadelphia, Inc. v. United States (42 Cust. Ct. 196, C.D. 2085), followed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of porcelain thermocouple tubes and that the involved articles are not chemical porcelain ware but are, in fact, articles in chief value [517]*517of earthy or mineral substances, not decorated or commercially susceptible of decoration in any manner, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. John H. Faunae, Philadelphia, Inc. v. United States (42 Cust. Ct. 196, C.D. 2085), followed.

Arklay S. Richards Co. v. United States, 55 Cust. Ct. 516, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1537 (cusc 1965).

Pincite

55 Cust. Ct. 516 (Arklay S. Richards Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related