Arkansas Valley Sugar Beet & Irrigated Land Co. v. Lubers
This text of 212 P. 848 (Arkansas Valley Sugar Beet & Irrigated Land Co. v. Lubers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
This is a proceeding in contempt against the defendants, three stockholders of the Fort Lyon Canal Company, for their refusal to obey the provision of a certain decree rendered by the district court of Prowers county, Colorado, requiring them, in nominating and voting for directors, to observe the provisions of that decree, which is contrary to the way which our statute provides.
This is a companion to People, ex rel. v. Burke, No. 10174, an ouster case, decided at this term and reported in 72 Colo. 486, 212 Pac. 837, in which this decree, which it is said the defendants defied, was held void per se. The two cases were argued here as one case. The decision in the ouster case controls the decision here, since a party who ignores or refuses to follow the directions of a void decree, is not guilty of contempt.
[514]*514The judgment of the district court, which reached the same conclusion, is accordingly affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
212 P. 848, 72 Colo. 513, 1923 Colo. LEXIS 261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arkansas-valley-sugar-beet-irrigated-land-co-v-lubers-colo-1923.