Arkansas v. Texas

Supreme Court

Arkansas v. Texas

351 U.S. 977

DecidedJune 11, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 351 U.S. 977 (Arkansas v. Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arkansas v. Texas, 351 U.S. 977 (1956).

Pincite

Opinion

It appearing that the controversy between the parties has been settled and that the State of Arkansas wishes to withdraw its Motion for Leave to File Complaint, the [978]*978request is granted and the proceeding is dismissed as moot.

Tom Gentry, Attorney General, and E. J. Ball for the State of Arkansas, complainant. John Ben Shepperd, Attorney General, and William H. Holloway and Marietta McGregor Creel, Assistant Attorneys General, for the State of Texas et al., defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It appearing that the controversy between the parties has been settled and that the State of Arkansas wishes to withdraw its Motion for Leave to File Complaint, the [978]*978request is granted and the proceeding is dismissed as moot.

Tom Gentry, Attorney General, and E. J. Ball for the State of Arkansas, complainant. John Ben Shepperd, Attorney General, and William H. Holloway and Marietta McGregor Creel, Assistant Attorneys General, for the State of Texas et al., defendants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

351 U.S. 977, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arkansas-v-texas-scotus-1956.