Arkansas v. Texas

Supreme Court

Arkansas v. Texas

351 U.S. 977

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Arkansas v. Texas. Read the opinion of the Court — 346 U.S. 368 →

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 11, 1956·Published

Opinion

It appearing that the controversy between the parties has been settled and that the State of Arkansas wishes to withdraw its Motion for Leave to File Complaint, the [978]*978request is granted and the proceeding is dismissed as moot.

Tom Gentry, Attorney General, and E. J. Ball for the State of Arkansas, complainant. John Ben Shepperd, Attorney General, and William H. Holloway and Marietta McGregor Creel, Assistant Attorneys General, for the State of Texas et al., defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It appearing that the controversy between the parties has been settled and that the State of Arkansas wishes to withdraw its Motion for Leave to File Complaint, the [978]*978request is granted and the proceeding is dismissed as moot.

Tom Gentry, Attorney General, and E. J. Ball for the State of Arkansas, complainant. John Ben Shepperd, Attorney General, and William H. Holloway and Marietta McGregor Creel, Assistant Attorneys General, for the State of Texas et al., defendants.

Arkansas v. Texas, 351 U.S. 977 (1956).

Pincite

351 U.S. 977 (Arkansas v. Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.