Arkansas v. Tennessee

Supreme Court

Arkansas v. Tennessee

389 U.S. 1026, 88 S. Ct. 757, 19 L. Ed. 2d 815, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 2736

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJanuary 15, 1968

Docket33, Original

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 389 U.S. 1026 (Arkansas v. Tennessee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arkansas v. Tennessee, 389 U.S. 1026, 88 S. Ct. 757, 19 L. Ed. 2d 815, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 2736 (1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for leave to file bill of complaint granted and the State of Tennessee allowed sixty days to answer.

It Is Ordered that the Honorable Gunnar H. Nordbye, Senior Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, be, and he is hereby, appointed Special Master in this case with authority to fix the time and conditions for the filing of additional pleadings and to direct subsequent proceedings, and with authority to summon witnesses, issue subpoenas, and take such evidence as may be introduced and such as he may deem it necessary to call for. The Master is directed to submit such reports as he may deem appropriate.

The Master shall be allowed his actual expenses. The allowances to him, the compensation paid to his technical, stenographic, and clerical assistants, the cost of printing his report, and all other proper expenses shall be charged against and be borne by the parties in such proportion as the Court hereafter may direct.

It Is Further Ordered that if the position of Special Master in this case becomes vacant during a recess of the Court, The Chief Justice shall have authority to make a new designation which shall have the same effect as if originally made by the Court herein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for leave to file bill of complaint granted and the State of Tennessee allowed sixty days to answer.

It Is Ordered that the Honorable Gunnar H. Nordbye, Senior Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, be, and he is hereby, appointed Special Master in this case with authority to fix the time and conditions for the filing of additional pleadings and to direct subsequent proceedings, and with authority to summon witnesses, issue subpoenas, and take such evidence as may be introduced and such as he may deem it necessary to call for. The Master is directed to submit such reports as he may deem appropriate.

The Master shall be allowed his actual expenses. The allowances to him, the compensation paid to his technical, stenographic, and clerical assistants, the cost of printing his report, and all other proper expenses shall be charged against and be borne by the parties in such proportion as the Court hereafter may direct.

It Is Further Ordered that if the position of Special Master in this case becomes vacant during a recess of the Court, The Chief Justice shall have authority to make a new designation which shall have the same effect as if originally made by the Court herein.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

389 U.S. 1026, 88 S. Ct. 757, 19 L. Ed. 2d 815, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 2736, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arkansas-v-tennessee-scotus-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack