Arkansas Fertilizer Co. v. Brattin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Arkansas Fertilizer Co. v. Brattin

1927 OK 252, 260 P. 43, 127 Okla. 9, 1927 Okla. LEXIS 245

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 13, 1927

Docket18486

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 1927 OK 252 (Arkansas Fertilizer Co. v. Brattin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arkansas Fertilizer Co. v. Brattin, 1927 OK 252, 260 P. 43, 127 Okla. 9, 1927 Okla. LEXIS 245 (Okla. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before the court on a motion of the defendant in error to strike the ease-made from the files and dismiss the appeal in this action, for the reason that the ease-made was settled and signed by a judge other than the judge who tried the cause without any showing being made that the trial judge was for any reason unable to settle the case.

An examination of the record discloses that this cause was tried by A. C. Brewster, and that the motion for new trial was overruled on the 31st day of December, 1926, and the case-made was settled and signed by Ad V. Coppedge on the 24th day of June, 1927. The further facts appear from the motion to dismiss and the response thereto that the term of office as district judge of A. C. Brewster had expired on the first Monday in January, 1927, and Ad V.. Coppedge had become his successor in office, and was on June 24, 1927, judge of the district court of Craig county.

Under section 788, C. O. S. 1921, the successor of the judge who tried the cause may settle the case when the judge who presided in the trial of said cause.shall have died, or be out of office and absent from the state, or unable to settle the case; otherwise under section 787, C. O'. S. 1921, the case-made shall be settled, certified, and signed by the judge who tried the cause even though the term of office of the trial judge shall have expired.

In the case of Mitchell v. Bruce, 85 Okla. 53, 204 Pac. 281, this court said;

“lit has been repeatedly held by this court that a case-made signed and' settled by the_ successor of the judge who tried the ease, in the absence of a showing as to the inability of the trial judge so to do, is a nullity. Baber v. Overton, 80 Okla. 128, 194 Pac. 893; Incorporated Town of Guymon v. Triplett, 71 Okla. 298, 177 Pac. 570; Brown v. Marks, 45 Okla. 711, 146 Pac. 707.”

In the case before us there is no showing in the record that the judge who tried this cause was unable for any of the reasons set forth in section 788. supra, to settle and sign the ease-made. The case-made is therefore a nullity and brings nothing to this court for review. The motion of the defendant in error is sustained and the appeal in said cause is hereby dismissed.

Note. — See 4 O. J. p. 364, §2021; p. 445, §2161.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before the court on a motion of the defendant in error to strike the ease-made from the files and dismiss the appeal in this action, for the reason that the ease-made was settled and signed by a judge other than the judge who tried the cause without any showing being made that the trial judge was for any reason unable to settle the case.

An examination of the record discloses that this cause was tried by A. C. Brewster, and that the motion for new trial was overruled on the 31st day of December, 1926, and the case-made was settled and signed by Ad V. Coppedge on the 24th day of June, 1927. The further facts appear from the motion to dismiss and the response thereto that the term of office as district judge of A. C. Brewster had expired on the first Monday in January, 1927, and Ad V.. Coppedge had become his successor in office, and was on June 24, 1927, judge of the district court of Craig county.

Under section 788, C. O. S. 1921, the successor of the judge who tried the cause may settle the case when the judge who presided in the trial of said cause.shall have died, or be out of office and absent from the state, or unable to settle the case; otherwise under section 787, C. O'. S. 1921, the case-made shall be settled, certified, and signed by the judge who tried the cause even though the term of office of the trial judge shall have expired.

In the case of Mitchell v. Bruce, 85 Okla. 53, 204 Pac. 281, this court said;

“lit has been repeatedly held by this court that a case-made signed and' settled by the_ successor of the judge who tried the ease, in the absence of a showing as to the inability of the trial judge so to do, is a nullity. Baber v. Overton, 80 Okla. 128, 194 Pac. 893; Incorporated Town of Guymon v. Triplett, 71 Okla. 298, 177 Pac. 570; Brown v. Marks, 45 Okla. 711, 146 Pac. 707.”

In the case before us there is no showing in the record that the judge who tried this cause was unable for any of the reasons set forth in section 788. supra, to settle and sign the ease-made. The case-made is therefore a nullity and brings nothing to this court for review. The motion of the defendant in error is sustained and the appeal in said cause is hereby dismissed.

Note. — See 4 O. J. p. 364, §2021; p. 445, §2161.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1927 OK 252, 260 P. 43, 127 Okla. 9, 1927 Okla. LEXIS 245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arkansas-fertilizer-co-v-brattin-okla-1927.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack