Arkadile v. State

695 So. 2d 1318, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7597, 1997 WL 363004
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 2, 1997·No. No. 96-02372·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

WHATLEY, Judge.

John T. Arkadile appeals his sentences imposed upon remand by the federal court in a habeas corpus proceeding. He raises several issues on appeal, but we find merit only in his contention that he is entitled to 216 days credit for time served.

Arkadile’s original sentences for his convictions of aggravated battery and false imprisonment reflect 216 days credit for time served. However, the sentence he received for the false imprisonment conviction upon resentencing fails to reflect this credit.

Accordingly, we remand Arkadile’s sentence for false imprisonment for correction to reflect that Arkadile is entitled to 216 days credit for time served. Arkadile need not be present for resentencing. See Brainard v. State, 550 So.2d 78 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). In all other respects, we affirm.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arkadile v. State, 695 So. 2d 1318, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7597, 1997 WL 363004 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

695 So. 2d 1318 (Arkadile v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. State
726 So. 2d 359 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Driver v. State
695 So. 2d 1318 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)