Arkadile v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Arkadile v. State

695 So. 2d 1318, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7597, 1997 WL 363004

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 2, 1997

DocketNo. 96-02372

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 695 So. 2d 1318 (Arkadile v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arkadile v. State, 695 So. 2d 1318, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7597, 1997 WL 363004 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

WHATLEY, Judge.

John T. Arkadile appeals his sentences imposed upon remand by the federal court in a habeas corpus proceeding. He raises several issues on appeal, but we find merit only in his contention that he is entitled to 216 days credit for time served.

Arkadile’s original sentences for his convictions of aggravated battery and false imprisonment reflect 216 days credit for time served. However, the sentence he received for the false imprisonment conviction upon resentencing fails to reflect this credit.

Accordingly, we remand Arkadile’s sentence for false imprisonment for correction to reflect that Arkadile is entitled to 216 days credit for time served. Arkadile need not be present for resentencing. See Brainard v. State, 550 So.2d 78 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). In all other respects, we affirm.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI