ARJCAR, L.L.C., Christina Rivera and Armando Rivera, Jr. v. Matthew McKenzie
This text of ARJCAR, L.L.C., Christina Rivera and Armando Rivera, Jr. v. Matthew McKenzie (ARJCAR, L.L.C., Christina Rivera and Armando Rivera, Jr. v. Matthew McKenzie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued August 27, 2024
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00284-CV ——————————— ARJCAR, L.L.C., CHRISTINA RIVERA, AND ARMANDO RIVERA, JR., Appellants V. MATTHEW MCKENZIE, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1204418
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellants ARJCAR, L.L.C., Christina Rivera, and Armando Rivera, Jr. filed
a notice of appeal from the trial court’s March 7, 2024 final judgment. Appellants
have neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of costs.
See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145; TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.851(b), 51.941(a); Order, Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in
Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District
Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). On May 3, 2024,
appellants were notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal if appellate costs
were not paid, or indigence was not established, by June 3, 2024. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 42.3(b), (c). Appellants did not adequately respond.
Further, appellants have not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for the
preparation of the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). On May 7, 2024,
appellants were notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal if appellants did
not submit written evidence that they had paid or made arrangements to pay the fee
for the preparation of the clerk’s record by June 6, 2024. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b),
(c). Appellants did not adequately respond.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and
want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c), 43.2(f). We dismiss any
pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Guerra, and Farris.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ARJCAR, L.L.C., Christina Rivera and Armando Rivera, Jr. v. Matthew McKenzie, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arjcar-llc-christina-rivera-and-armando-rivera-jr-v-matthew-texapp-2024.