Arizona v. Rumsey

465 U.S. 1019, 104 S. Ct. 1268, 79 L. Ed. 2d 674, 52 U.S.L.W. 3610, 1984 U.S. LEXIS 1021

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Arizona v. Rumsey. Read the opinion of the Court — 467 U.S. 203 →

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 21, 1984·No. No. 83-226·Published

Opinion

Sup. Ct. Ariz. [Certio-rari granted, 464 U. S. 1038.] Motion for appointment of counsel granted, and it is ordered that James R. Rummage, Esquire, of Phoenix, Ariz., be appointed to serve as counsel for respondent in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arizona v. Rumsey, 465 U.S. 1019, 104 S. Ct. 1268, 79 L. Ed. 2d 674, 52 U.S.L.W. 3610, 1984 U.S. LEXIS 1021 (1984).

Pincite

465 U.S. 1019 (Arizona v. Rumsey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.