Arizona v. California

Supreme Court

Arizona v. California

498 U.S. 964, 111 S. Ct. 450, 112 L. Ed. 2d 409, 59 U.S.L.W. 3389, 1990 U.S. LEXIS 5833

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Arizona v. California. Read the opinion of the Court — 493 U.S. 886 →

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 13, 1990·No. No. 8·Published

Opinion

It is ordered that Frank McGarr, Esq., of Chicago, Ill., be appointed Special Master in place of Robert B. McKay, deceased.

The Special Master shall have authority to fix the time and conditions for the filing of additional pleadings and to direct subsequent proceedings, and with authority to summon witnesses, issue subpoenas, and take such evidence as may be introduced and such as he may deem it necessary to call for. The Special Master is directed to submit such reports as he may deem appropriate.

[For earlier order herein, see, e. g., 493 U. S. 971.]

The compensation of the Special Master, the allowances to him, the compensation paid to his legal, technical, stenographic, and clerical assistants, the cost of printing his report, and all other proper expenses, including travel expenses, shall be charged against and be borne by the parties in such proportion as the Court may hereafter direct.

Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It is ordered that Frank McGarr, Esq., of Chicago, Ill., be appointed Special Master in place of Robert B. McKay, deceased.

The Special Master shall have authority to fix the time and conditions for the filing of additional pleadings and to direct subsequent proceedings, and with authority to summon witnesses, issue subpoenas, and take such evidence as may be introduced and such as he may deem it necessary to call for. The Special Master is directed to submit such reports as he may deem appropriate.

[For earlier order herein, see, e. g., 493 U. S. 971.]

The compensation of the Special Master, the allowances to him, the compensation paid to his legal, technical, stenographic, and clerical assistants, the cost of printing his report, and all other proper expenses, including travel expenses, shall be charged against and be borne by the parties in such proportion as the Court may hereafter direct.

Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this order.

Arizona v. California, 498 U.S. 964, 111 S. Ct. 450, 112 L. Ed. 2d 409, 59 U.S.L.W. 3389, 1990 U.S. LEXIS 5833 (1990).

Pincite

498 U.S. 964 (Arizona v. California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.