Arizona v. California

Supreme Court

Arizona v. California

351 U.S. 977

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 11, 1956·No. No. 10·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

It is ordered by this Court that the compensation of George I. Haight as Special Master for services rendered by him in his lifetime pursuant to the order entered in this cause on June 1, 1954, be and the same is hereby fixed in the sum of $35,000; and that said sum shall be paid by the parties to Kathleen Haight, Executrix of the Estate of George I. Haight, deceased, in the following proportions: Arizona 25%, California 25%, United States 25%, Nevada 20%, New Mexico 2%%, Utah 2%%.

The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this question.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It is ordered by this Court that the compensation of George I. Haight as Special Master for services rendered by him in his lifetime pursuant to the order entered in this cause on June 1, 1954, be and the same is hereby fixed in the sum of $35,000; and that said sum shall be paid by the parties to Kathleen Haight, Executrix of the Estate of George I. Haight, deceased, in the following proportions: Arizona 25%, California 25%, United States 25%, Nevada 20%, New Mexico 2%%, Utah 2%%.

The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this question.

Arizona v. California, 351 U.S. 977 (1956).

Pincite

351 U.S. 977 (Arizona v. California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related