Arizona v. California
344 U.S. 806, 73 S. Ct. 6
Opinion
A rule is ordered to issue, returnable within sixty days, requiring the defendants to show cause why leave to file the bill of complaint should not be granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Arizona v. California, 344 U.S. 806, 73 S. Ct. 6 (1952).
344 U.S. 806 (Arizona v. California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nussbaum v. Weeks
214 Cal. App. 3d 1589 (California Court of Appeal, 1989)
Borman's, Inc. v. Liquor Control Commission
195 N.W.2d 316 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1972)
Zenith Transport, Ltd. v. Bellingham National Bank
395 P.2d 498 (Washington Supreme Court, 1964)
Marvel Specialty Co. v. Bell Hosiery Mills, Inc.
216 F. Supp. 824 (W.D. North Carolina, 1963)
Union Carbide Corporation v. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co., Inc., and the Lincoln Electric Company, Union Carbide Corporation v. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co., Inc., and the Lincoln Electric Company
282 F.2d 653 (Seventh Circuit, 1960)
Union Carbide Corp. v. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co.
282 F.2d 653 (Seventh Circuit, 1960)
State Ex Rel. Brassey v. Hanson
342 P.2d 706 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1959)
Brooke v. People
339 P.2d 993 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1959)