Arizona, State of v. Michael D Lansky LLC

District Court, D. Arizona·Decided December 10, 2024·No. 4:23-cv-00233·Unknown

Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5

9 State of Arizona, et al., No. CV-23-00233-TUC-CKJ

10 Plaintiffs, CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER 11 v.

12 Michael D Lansky LLC, et al.,

13 Defendants. 14 15 The Court, having reviewed the parties' Supplemental Joint Case Management 16 Report (Doc. 96), the original case management plan (Doc. 79), and the individual 17 discovery plans (Docs. 89 and 95), 18 IT IS ORDERED that the parties abide by the following schedule and rules: 19 A. Initial disclosures, under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ("Federal Rules") 20 26(a)(1) the parties made these disclosures on September 6, 2024, except Defendants 21 failed to produce a copy or description by category and location of all documents, 22 electronically stored information and tangible things that they have in their possession, 23 custody, or control and may use to support their claims or defenses, unless the use would 24 be solely for impeachment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(A)(ii). If such disclosures have not 25 been made, Defendants shall make these disclosures within 14 days of the filing date of 26 this Order. 27 The Court notifies the parties that to satisfy the requirement of Rule 26, the parties 28 shall file a Notice of Service of discovery papers with the Clerk of the Court, rather than 1 copies of actual disclosures. See Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for 2 the District of Arizona, Civil ("Local Rules") 5.2. 3 B. The Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Rule 15, shall apply for any joinder 4 of additional parties or to amend the pleadings. 5 C. Expert Testimony, pursuant to Federal Rule 26(a)(2), shall take place as 6 follows: Plaintiff shall notice initial expert testimony on or before September 1, 2025. 7 Notice of Defendant’s initial expert testimony pursuant to Federal Rule 26(a)(2) shall take 8 place on or before October 1, 2025. Notice of rebuttal expert testimony shall be completed 9 on or before October 15, 2025. 10 D. Fact witnesses shall be disclosed by name (i.e., a witness list) to be used at 11 trial pursuant to the provisions of Federal Rule 26(a)(3) on or before September 1, 2025. 12 E. All discovery, including depositions of parties and witnesses, shall be 13 completed by November 3, 2025. 14 1. Generally, the limits on discovery by as set forth in Federal Rules 30, 15 31, and 33 shall apply: twenty-five (25) single-part question interrogatories, depositions 16 of parties, except party depositions are limited to Defendants, the lead Plaintiff States of 17 Arizona, Indiana, North Carolina, and Ohio, and any Plaintiff state bringing state law 18 actions against Defendants. The parties may conduct depositions of respective experts and 19 not more than ten non-party fact witness depositions per party. 20 2. Notwithstanding any provisions of the Federal Rules or any other 21 provisions of this Order, non-party witnesses shall not be allowed to attend, physically, 22 electronically or otherwise, the deposition of any other witness in this case without an 23 Order of the Court to the contrary. 24 3. The parties and counsel are reminded of their duty under Federal Rule 25 26(e) to supplement all Rule 26(a) disclosures and responses to discovery requests. 26 Pursuant to Rule 26(e)(1), any additions or other changes to information previously 27 disclosed must be made prior to the time that Rule 26(a)(3) Pretrial Disclosures are due. 28 This Order contemplates that all exhibits and witnesses that may be offered at trial will 1 have been disclosed before the close of discovery. This Order, therefore, supersedes the 2 "30 days before trial" disclosure deadline contained in Rule 26(a)(3). Therefore, (1) failure 3 to timely supplement Rule 26(a) disclosure, including but not limited to witnesses and 4 exhibits, or (2) failure to timely supplement responses to any valid discovery requests, or 5 (3) attempting to include any witnesses or exhibits in the Proposed Final Pretrial Order that 6 were not previously disclosed in a timely manner as to allow for meaningful discovery 7 prior to the discovery cutoff date, may result in the exclusion of such evidence at trial or 8 the imposition of sanctions. 9 4. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.2(j), parties must personally consult and 10 make a sincere effort to resolve a discovery dispute before seeking the Court's assistance. 11 If the parties are unable to resolve a discovery dispute, the parties shall notify the Court by 12 calling the law clerk, Greer Barkley, by telephone at (520) 205-4550. Written briefs shall 13 be filed only at the direction of the Court. 14 F. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502: 15 1. The production of privileged or work-product protected documents, 16 electronically stored information (ESI) or information, whether inadvertent or otherwise, 17 is not a waiver of the privilege or protection from discovery in this case or in any other 18 federal or state proceeding. This order shall be interpreted to provide the maximum 19 protection allowed by Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d). 20 2. Nothing contained herein is intended to or shall serve to limit a party's 21 right to conduct a review of documents, ESI, or information (including metadata) for 22 relevance, responsiveness and/or segregation of privileged and/or protected information 23 before production. 24 G. Dispositive motions shall be filed on or before December 1, 2025. 25 1. If a party seeks oral argument on a motion, the party shall request it at 26 the time the motion or response is filed, pursuant to Local Rule 7.2(f). 27 2. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.2, parties may file a motion, response and 28 reply. No additional briefing on a motion is allowed unless leave of Court is granted. 1 Failure to file a response may be deemed a consent to a granting of the motion. A response 2 must be served and filed within fourteen (14) days of service of the motion; the moving 3 party has seven (7) days from service to serve and file a reply. Federal Rule 56 motions 4 for summary judgment and Federal Rule 12(b)(1) motions to dismiss for lack of subject 5 matter jurisdiction provide an exception to the above time limits – time for response is 6 thirty (30) days and for reply fifteen (15) days. See L.R. 56.1(d). Unless otherwise 7 permitted by the Court, a motion or response, inclusive of supporting memorandum but 8 exclusive of attachments and statement of facts, shall not exceed seventeen (17) pages; a 9 reply shall not exceed eleven (11) pages. 10 3. The Court advises the parties that the Local Rule requirement that 11 “[a]ny party opposing a motion for summary judgment shall file a statement, separate from 12 that party’s memorandum of law, setting forth . . . for each paragraph of the moving party’s 13 separate statement of facts, a correspondingly numbered paragraph indicating whether the 14 party disputes the statement of fact set forth in that paragraph and a reference to the specific 15 admissible portion of the record supporting the party’s position if the fact is disputed ... [,]” 16 L.R.Civ. 56.1, shall only apply to material facts that establish or dispute a genuine issue in 17 dispute. 18 4. Any pleading which is submitted with more than one exhibit must be 19 accompanied by a Table of Contents. The exhibits must be indexed with tabs that 20 correspond to the Table of Contents. 21 5. Absent exigent circumstances, the Court will not consider pleadings 22 which do not conform to these requirements. 23 H.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arizona, State of v. Michael D Lansky LLC, (D. Ariz. 2024).

Arizona, State of v. Michael D Lansky LLC (Arizona, State of v. Michael D Lansky LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related