Arizona Service Co. v. Visco

Arizona Supreme Court

Arizona Service Co. v. Visco

389 P.2d 122, 95 Ariz. 246, 1964 Ariz. LEXIS 325

CourtArizona Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 5, 1964

DocketNo. 7227

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 389 P.2d 122 (Arizona Service Co. v. Visco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arizona Service Co. v. Visco, 389 P.2d 122, 95 Ariz. 246, 1964 Ariz. LEXIS 325 (Ark. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

NABOURS, Superior Court Judge.

The controversy between these parties to this action was determined on its merits in Visco v. State ex rel. Pickrell, 95 Ariz. 154, 388 P.2d 155, decided December 26, 1963. This appeal therefor is dismissed as moot.

LOCKWOOD, V. C. J., and STRUCKMEYER, BERNSTEIN and JENNINGS, JJ., concur.

Note: Chief Justice JESSE A. UDALL, having disqualified himself, the Honorable WILLIAM W. NABOURS, Judge of the Superior Court of Yuma County, Arizona, was called to sit in his stead and participate in the determination of this appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NABOURS, Superior Court Judge.

The controversy between these parties to this action was determined on its merits in Visco v. State ex rel. Pickrell, 95 Ariz. 154, 388 P.2d 155, decided December 26, 1963. This appeal therefor is dismissed as moot.

LOCKWOOD, V. C. J., and STRUCKMEYER, BERNSTEIN and JENNINGS, JJ., concur.

Note: Chief Justice JESSE A. UDALL, having disqualified himself, the Honorable WILLIAM W. NABOURS, Judge of the Superior Court of Yuma County, Arizona, was called to sit in his stead and participate in the determination of this appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

389 P.2d 122, 95 Ariz. 246, 1964 Ariz. LEXIS 325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arizona-service-co-v-visco-ariz-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack