Arizona Service Co. v. Visco

Arizona Supreme Court

Arizona Service Co. v. Visco

389 P.2d 122, 95 Ariz. 246, 1964 Ariz. LEXIS 325

Arizona Supreme Court·Decided February 5, 1964·No. No. 7227·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

NABOURS, Superior Court Judge.

The controversy between these parties to this action was determined on its merits in Visco v. State ex rel. Pickrell, 95 Ariz. 154, 388 P.2d 155, decided December 26, 1963. This appeal therefor is dismissed as moot.

LOCKWOOD, V. C. J., and STRUCKMEYER, BERNSTEIN and JENNINGS, JJ., concur.

Note: Chief Justice JESSE A. UDALL, having disqualified himself, the Honorable WILLIAM W. NABOURS, Judge of the Superior Court of Yuma County, Arizona, was called to sit in his stead and participate in the determination of this appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NABOURS, Superior Court Judge.

The controversy between these parties to this action was determined on its merits in Visco v. State ex rel. Pickrell, 95 Ariz. 154, 388 P.2d 155, decided December 26, 1963. This appeal therefor is dismissed as moot.

LOCKWOOD, V. C. J., and STRUCKMEYER, BERNSTEIN and JENNINGS, JJ., concur.

Note: Chief Justice JESSE A. UDALL, having disqualified himself, the Honorable WILLIAM W. NABOURS, Judge of the Superior Court of Yuma County, Arizona, was called to sit in his stead and participate in the determination of this appeal.

Arizona Service Co. v. Visco, 389 P.2d 122, 95 Ariz. 246, 1964 Ariz. LEXIS 325 (Ark. 1964).

Pincite

389 P.2d 122 (Arizona Service Co. v. Visco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related