Arizona Eastern Railroad v. Bryan

Supreme Court

Arizona Eastern Railroad v. Bryan

242 U.S. 621, 37 S. Ct. 241, 61 L. Ed. 532, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1569

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJanuary 15, 1917

DocketNo. 651

StatusPublished

This text of 242 U.S. 621 (Arizona Eastern Railroad v. Bryan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arizona Eastern Railroad v. Bryan, 242 U.S. 621, 37 S. Ct. 241, 61 L. Ed. 532, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1569 (1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of (1) Chicago Junction Railway Co. v. King, 222 U. S. 222; Seaboard Air Line v. Padgett, 236 U. S. 668; Great Northern Ry. Co. v. Knapp, 240 U. S. 464; Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. v. Whitacre, ante, 169; (2) Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Earnest, 229 U. S. 114, 121-122. Mr. Eugene S. Ives for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Thomas Armstrong, Jr., Mr. Ernest W. Lewis and Mr. G. P. Bullard for the defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of (1) Chicago Junction Railway Co. v. King, 222 U. S. 222; Seaboard Air Line v. Padgett, 236 U. S. 668; Great Northern Ry. Co. v. Knapp, 240 U. S. 464; Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. v. Whitacre, ante, 169; (2) Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Earnest, 229 U. S. 114, 121-122. Mr. Eugene S. Ives for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Thomas Armstrong, Jr., Mr. Ernest W. Lewis and Mr. G. P. Bullard for the defendant in error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

242 U.S. 621, 37 S. Ct. 241, 61 L. Ed. 532, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arizona-eastern-railroad-v-bryan-scotus-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack