Aristocrat Technologies, Inc. v. Light & Wonder, Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nevada
DecidedMay 21, 2024
Docket2:24-cv-00382
StatusUnknown

This text of Aristocrat Technologies, Inc. v. Light & Wonder, Inc. (Aristocrat Technologies, Inc. v. Light & Wonder, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aristocrat Technologies, Inc. v. Light & Wonder, Inc., (D. Nev. 2024).

Opinion

1 NICHOLAS J. SANTORO (Nevada Bar No. 532) 2 JASON D. SMITH (Nevada Bar No. 9691) 3 HOLLEY DRIGGS LTD 300 South 4th Street, Suite 1600 4 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Tel.: (702) 791-0308 5 Email: nsantoro@nevadafirm.com jsmith@nevadafirm.com 6 PETER A. SWANSON ZIWEI SONG 7 (pro hac vice) (pro hac vice) GARY M. RUBMAN COVINGTON & BURLING LLP 8 (pro hac vice) Salesforce Tower SIMEON BOTWINICK 415 Mission Street, Suite 5400 9 (pro hac vice) San Francisco, CA 94105-2533 COVINGTON & BURLING LLP Tel.: (415) 591-6000 10 One CityCenter Email: ksong@cov.com 850 Tenth Street, NW 11 Washington, DC 20001 Tel.: (202) 662-6000 12 Email: pswanson@cov.com grubman@cov.com 13 sbotwinick@cov.com

14 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Aristocrat Technologies, Inc. and 15 Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd.

16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 DISTRICT OF NEVADA

18 ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES 19 AUSTRALIA PTY LTD.,

20 Plaintiffs,

21 v. Civil Case No. 2:24-cv-00382-GMN-MDC 22 LIGHT & WONDER, INC., LNW GAMING, INC., and SCIPLAY CORPORATION, 23 Defendants. STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 24

25 26 27 1 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), Plaintiffs Aristocrat Technologies, Inc. 2 and Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd. and Defendants Light & Wonder, Inc., LNW 3 Gaming, Inc., and SciPlay Corporation, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate 4 and agree that discovery in the above-captioned action (“Action”) may involve the disclosure of 5 certain documents, things, and information that are alleged to constitute or contain trade secrets, 6 financial records, or other proprietary and confidential research, development, or commercial 7 information within the meaning of Rule 26(c), and that must be protected in order to preserve 8 legitimate business interests. Good cause exists for the entry of this Protective Order pursuant to 9 Rule 26(c) because it protects against improper disclosure or use of such trade secrets, financial 10 records, and proprietary and confidential information produced or disclosed in this case. The 11 parties therefore further stipulate and agree, subject to the approval of the Court, that the terms and 12 conditions of this Protective Order shall govern the handling of documents, depositions, pleadings, 13 exhibits and all other information exchanged by the parties in this Action, or provided by or 14 obtained from non-parties in this Action. The parties agree to comply with the terms and conditions 15 of this Protective Order pending approval by the Court. 16 SCOPE 17 1. This Protective Order shall apply to all documents, electronically stored 18 information, tangible things, testimony, or other discovery material in this Action, including 19 responses to requests for production of documents, answers to interrogatories, responses to 20 requests for admissions, deposition testimony, expert testimony and reports, exhibits and all other 21 discovery taken pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, matters in evidence and any 22 other information hereafter furnished, directly or indirectly, by or on behalf of any party, non-party 23 or witness in connection with this Action (“Discovery Material”). 24 2. As used herein, “Producing Party” shall refer to any party to this Action and to any 25 non-party who produces Discovery Material, and “Receiving Party” shall refer to any individual 26 who properly receives or is shown Discovery Material. 27 1 DESIGNATION 2 3. A Producing Party may designate Discovery Material as “CONFIDENTIAL” or 3 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” (materials so designated are 4 “Confidentially Designated”) in accordance with this Protective Order if the party in good faith 5 believes that such Discovery Material contains CONFIDENTIAL or HIGHLY 6 CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY information as defined in Paragraph 4. The 7 burden of establishing that Discovery Material is CONFIDENTIAL or HIGHLY 8 CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY as defined herein shall be on the Producing 9 Party. The designation of any Discovery Material as CONFIDENTIAL or HIGHLY 10 CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY shall be deemed effective unless and until the 11 Court orders otherwise or the Producing Party withdraws the designation. 12 4. CONFIDENTIAL and HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES 13 ONLY Discovery Material shall be construed as follows: 14 a. CONFIDENTIAL Discovery Material refers to information that reflects 15 marketing information, contacts, financial information, proprietary business 16 information, and/or similar commercially sensitive business information or data 17 which the designating party in good faith believes in fact is confidential or that 18 unprotected disclosure might result in economic or competitive injury, and which 19 is not publicly known. 20 b. HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY Discovery 21 Material refers to any Confidential information (as defined in Section 4(a) above), 22 trade secrets, know-how, proprietary data, technical information relating to a trade 23 secret, or other confidential research or development information that, if disclosed 24 to the other party, non-parties, or the public, would cause substantial risk of 25 competitive, business, or personal injury to the Producing Party or others. This 26 includes, without limitation, information that may be subject to an existing 27 obligation of confidentiality by the Producing Party or its affiliates, financial 1 information (e.g., detailed nonpublic financial information such as information 2 relating to sales, sales volume, profits, account balances, and money transfers), 3 game design and development information, strategic business plans, forecasts, and 4 other commercial, marketing or technical information that the Producing Party 5 reasonably believes would provide significant technical or business advantage to 6 the Receiving Party. 7 FORM AND TIMING OF DESIGNATION 8 5. Confidentially Designated documents shall be so designated by placing or affixing 9 the wording “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES 10 ONLY” on each page of the document in a manner that will not interfere with the legibility of the 11 document, or through other means reasonable in the circumstances for noting the appropriate 12 confidentiality designation for electronic documents. Documents shall be designated 13 CONFIDENTIAL or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY prior to, or 14 contemporaneously with, the production or disclosure of the documents. 15 6. Portions of depositions shall be deemed Confidentially Designated if designated as 16 such when the deposition is taken or within fourteen (14) calendar days after receipt of the 17 transcript. Depositions shall be automatically treated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL— 18 ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY for fourteen (14) calendar days after receipt of the transcript. 19 7. Information from inspection of things and premises shall be deemed Confidentially 20 Designated if designated as such at the time of the inspection or within fourteen (14) calendar days 21 after the inspection. All information gleaned from inspection of things and premises shall be 22 automatically treated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY for fourteen 23 (14) calendar days after the day of inspection. 24 8. To the extent that any party wishes to file or submit for filing as part of the Court 25 record any Discovery Materials subject to this Protective Order, or any pleading, motion or 26 memorandum referring to them, the party wishing to do so shall cause to be filed a motion for 27 leave to file such materials under seal pursuant to the Court’s local rules and any other applicable 1 rules governing sealed documents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Aristocrat Technologies, Inc. v. Light & Wonder, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aristocrat-technologies-inc-v-light-wonder-inc-nvd-2024.