UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION
ARIGNA TECHNOLOGY LIMITED,
Plaintiff, Case No. 6:21-cv-00943-ADA
vs.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD; JURY TRIAL DEMANDED SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.; and APPLE INC.
Defendants.
ORDER REGARDING PROTECTIVE ORDER The parties sent the Court an email submission disputing the entry of a protective order. The Court hereby resolves the dispute. Apple’s Position 1) Deletion of Source Code Provisions (references to source code, deleting Arigna’s Paragraph 13 and adding Apple’s Paragraph 36). The parties’ primary area of dispute is the treatment of highly sensitive/confidential source code. Arigna concedes it is not seeking to review source code at this time, nor has any party produced code. Arigna has informed Apple that it urgently seeks to enter a Protective Order so that its experts may review Apple confidential documents – not code. Apple therefore proposes deleting all source code provisions so that the parties can separately negotiate source code provisions when and if code is implicated in this case, or alternatively, entering Apple’s proposed additions in Exhibit 1 in Apple’s redlined Protective Order. 2) No Sharing of Defendants’ Confidential Information with Each Other (Paragraph 32). This provision ensures that no defendant’s confidential information is shared with another defendant absent the other defendant’s consent, as Apple and Samsung are competitors. Additionally, this provision is consistent with Arigna’s request to restrict defendants from sharing Arigna’s infringement contentions with each other, which the Court previously granted. Feb. 16, 2022 Hrg. Tr. at 17:2-17.
3) Geographic restrictions and export controls of Apple confidential information (Paragraphs 7(e) and 31). This standard provision reduces the risk associated with transporting Protected Material to foreign jurisdictions and ensures Apple’s compliance with export control laws. The Protective Order does not (and cannot) grant any Federal Court personal jurisdiction over persons located in foreign countries necessary to enforce the Protective Order. Westerngeco LLC v. Ion Geophysical Corp., 776 F. Supp. 2d 342, 367 n.17 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 2, 2011) (“Although a state may, in limited circumstances, extend its jurisdiction beyond the territorial limits of its sovereignty, any such extension is ‘subject to the consent of other nations.’”). Non-public information produced in this litigation is also likely to be subject to export control designations, including for example Export Control Classification Numbers 5A992.c and EAR99. This
provision is therefore appropriate and reasonable. See, e.g., ContentGuard Holdings, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al., Case No. 2:13-cv-01112-JRG (Docket No. 151) at 6 (E.D. Tex. June 6, 2014) (entering “No Export” provision). 4) Addition of Fed. R. Evid. 502(d). This standard provision clarifies the scope of inadvertent production of privileged material by allowing, under FRE 502(d), the Court to “order that the privilege or protection is not waived by disclosure connected with the litigation pending before the court — in which event the disclosure is also not a waiver in any other federal or state proceeding.” This provision seeks to prevent any party from using inadvertent productions in this litigation in other litigations. 5) Confidentiality designations for native file printouts (Paragraph 5). When native files are printed for use in depositions, confidentiality designations will not appear on the printouts. Apple therefore requests parties add such designations on printouts of confidential, native files. 6) Destruction of inadvertently produced materials lacking proper designations
(Paragraph 6). Arigna’s Proposed Order is ambiguous as to how long a party may retain inadvertently produced materials. Apple requests a period of three business days to avoid unreasonable retention of these materials. Arigna’s Position 1) Source Code Provisions. There is no need to defer the entry of source code provisions. It is unclear at this point whether Defendants will produce source code in this case, but third party manufacturers of relevant semiconductor chips are likely to do so. Entering a protective order with the Court’s default source code provisions will clarify the procedures for any source code productions that take place and avoid future disputes. 2) One-Sided Restriction on Arigna. This provision is absent from the Court’s default order
and is superfluous. Under the default protective order, all parties must handle Protected Material as prescribed by the protective order’s provisions—which would not permit Arigna to share Apple’s Protected Material with Samsung. Moreover, Apple’s proposed provision is unilaterally restrictive on Plaintiff, and not on Defendants. 3) Geographic Restriction. Apple’s proposed geographic restrictions are not in the Court’s default protective order and would impose unnecessary and prejudicial burdens. Arigna is an Irish company and intends to work with a technical consultant based outside the U.S. These provisions would unreasonably curtail Arigna’s access to information permitted by the other protective order provisions as well as its consultant’s involvement in this matter. 4) Federal Rule of Evid. 502(d). This provision is not included in the Court’s default order and is superfluous to the default order’s protections. 5) Native Files. Apple’s proposed provision is not limited to native files and would impose an unnecessary logistical and practical burden. 6) Three-Day Destruction. Apple’s strict requirement of destruction within three business days is unnecessary, and absent from the Court’s default protective order. Resolution The Court generally defaults to its model protective order and deviates as little as possible from its model protective order except by agreement of the parties. The Court will enter Arigna’s version of the protective order, which contains restrictions on using source code like the model protective order. The Court finds no reason to permit secure electronic transfer and removes this provision. The parties’ agreed terms to transfer by hard copy and physical media is convenient enough. Source code is among a company’s most valuable and protected assets. Arigna articulates no justification for risking exposure of source code via electronic transfer. The Court likewise sees no reason to delay entering a protective order with source code provisions if third parties are likely to need source code protection. Export control laws have force regardless of whether the protective order mentions them. Apple’s justification for editing paragraph 5 is redundant with other paragraphs of the model protective order that require documents to be marked with their confidentiality designation. The Court rejects the other proposed modifications that do not appear in the model protective order. The Court hereby enters the appended Protective Order. SIGNED this 12th day of April, 2022. Cis Ge wh ALAN D ALBRIGHT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD; JURY TRIAL DEMANDED SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.; and APPLE INC.
PROTECTIVE ORDER WHEREAS, Plaintiff Arigna Technology Limited and Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Apple Inc., hereafter referred to as “the Parties,” believe that certain information that is or will be encompassed by discovery demands by the Parties involves the production or disclosure of trade secrets, confidential business information, or other proprietary information; WHEREAS, the Parties seek a protective order limiting disclosure thereof in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c): THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated among the Parties and ORDERED that:
1. Each Party may designate as confidential for protection under this Order, in whole or in part, any document, information, or material that constitutes or includes, in whole or in part, confidential or proprietary information or trade secrets of the Party or a Third Party to whom the Party reasonably believes it owes an obligation of confidentiality with respect to such document, information, or material (“Protected Material”)1. Protected Material shall be designated by the Party producing it by affixing a legend or stamp on such document, information, or material as follows: “CONFIDENTIAL.” The word “CONFIDENTIAL” shall be placed clearly on each page of the Protected Material (except deposition and hearing
transcripts) for which such protection is sought. For deposition and hearing transcripts, the word “CONFIDENTIAL” shall be placed on the cover page of the transcript (if not already present on the cover page of the transcript when received from the court reporter) by each attorney receiving a copy of the transcript after that attorney receives notice of the designation of some or all of that transcript as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 2. Any document produced before issuance of this Order, including pursuant to the Court’s Order Governing Proceedings - Patent Case, with the designation “Confidential” or the like shall receive the same treatment as if designated “CONFIDENTIAL” under this order and any such documents produced with the designation “Confidential - Outside Attorneys’ Eyes Only” shall receive the same treatment as if designated “CONFIDENTIAL -
OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” under this Order, unless and until such document is re-designated to have a different classification under this Order. 3. With respect to documents, information, or material designated “CONFIDENTIAL,” “CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” “CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or “CONFIDENTIAL - SOURCE CODE” (“DESIGNATED MATERIAL”),2 subject to the provisions herein and unless otherwise
1 Protected Material shall not include: (i) advertising materials that have been actually published or publicly disseminated; and (ii) materials that show on their face they have been disseminated to the public. 2 The term DESIGNATED MATERIAL is used throughout this Protective Order to refer to the class of materials designated as “CONFIDENTIAL,” “CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES stated, this Order governs, without limitation: (a) all documents, electronically stored information, and/or things as defined by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; (b) all pretrial, hearing or deposition testimony, or documents marked as exhibits or for identification in depositions and hearings; (c) pretrial pleadings, exhibits to pleadings and
other court filings; (d) affidavits; and (e) stipulations. All copies, reproductions, extracts, digests, and complete or partial summaries prepared from any DESIGNATED MATERIALS shall also be considered DESIGNATED MATERIAL and treated as such under this Order. 4. Written discovery, documents (which include “electronically stored information,” as that phrase is used in Federal Rule of Procedure 34), and tangible things that meet the requirements for the confidentiality designations may be so designated by placing the appropriate designation on every page of the written material prior to production. For digital files being produced, the Producing Party may mark each viewable page or image with the appropriate designation, and mark the medium, container, and/or communication
in which the digital files were contained. In the event that original documents are produced for inspection, the original documents shall be presumed “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” during the inspection and re-designated, as appropriate during the copying process. 5. Where electronic files and documents are produced in native electronic format, such electronic files and documents shall be designated for protection under this Order by appending to the file names or designators information indicating whether the file contains
ONLY,” “CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or “CONFIDENTIAL - SOURCE CODE,” individually and collectively. “CONFIDENTIAL,” “CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or “CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY - SOURCE CODE,” material, or shall use any other reasonable method for so designating Protected Materials produced in electronic format.
6. A designation of Protected Material (i.e., “CONFIDENTIAL,” “CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” “CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or “CONFIDENTIAL - SOURCE CODE”) may be made at any time. Inadvertent or unintentional production of documents, information, or material that has not been designated as DESIGNATED MATERIAL shall not be deemed a waiver in whole or in part of a claim for confidential treatment. Any Party that inadvertently or unintentionally produces Protected Material without designating it as DESIGNATED MATERIAL may request destruction of that Protected Material by notifying the recipient(s) as soon as reasonably possible after the producing Party becomes aware of the inadvertent or unintentional disclosure, and providing replacement Protected Material that is properly
designated. The recipient(s) shall then destroy all copies of the inadvertently or unintentionally produced Protected Materials and any documents, information, or material derived from or based thereon. 7. “CONFIDENTIAL” documents, information, and material may be disclosed only to the following persons, except upon receipt of the prior written consent of the designating Party, upon order of the Court, or as set forth in paragraph 15 herein: (a) Outside counsel of record in this Action for the Parties3.
(b) Employees of such counsel assigned to and reasonably necessary to assist such
3 This include Outside Counsel’s immediate paralegals and staff, and any copying or clerical litigation support services working at the direction of such counsel, paralegals, and staff counsel in the litigation of this Action.
(c) In-house counsel for the Parties who either have responsibility for making decisions dealing directly with the litigation of this Action, or who are assisting outside counsel in the litigation of this Action.
(d) Up to and including three (3) designated representatives of each of the Parties provided that each such person has agreed to be bound by the provisions of the Protective Order by signing a copy of Appendix A; and (b) to the extent reasonably necessary for the litigation of this Action, except that any Party may in good faith request the other Party’s consent to designate one or more additional representatives, the other Party shall not unreasonably withhold such consent, and the requesting Party may seek leave of Court to designate such additional representative(s) if the requesting Party believes the other Party has unreasonably withheld such consent.
(e) Outside consultants or experts retained for the purpose of this litigation, provided that: (1) such consultants or experts are not presently employed by the Parties or of an affiliate of a Party hereto for purposes other than this Action; (2) before access is given, the consultant or expert has completed the Undertaking attached as Appendix A hereto and the same is served upon the producing Party with a current curriculum vitae of the consultant or expert, including a list of other cases in which the individual has provided a report or testified (at trial or deposition) and a list of companies that the individual has been employed by or provided consulting services pertaining to the field of the invention of the patent(s)-in-suit or the products accused of infringement within the last four years; and a brief description of the subject matter of the consultancy or employment, at least ten (10) days before access to the Protected Material is to be given to that consultant or expert to object to and notify the receiving Party in writing that it objects to disclosure of Protected Material to the consultant or expert, provided that the producing Party is a Party to this litigation. The Parties agree to promptly confer and use good faith to resolve any such objection. If the Parties are unable to resolve any objection, the objecting Party may file a motion with the Court within fifteen (15) days of receipt of the notice, or within such other time as the Parties may agree, seeking a protective order with respect to the proposed disclosure. The objecting Party shall have the burden of proving the need for a protective order. No disclosure shall occur until all such objections are resolved by agreement or Court order.
(f) Independent litigation support services, including persons working for or as court reporters, graphics or design services, jury or trial consulting services, and photocopy, document imaging, and database services retained by counsel and reasonably necessary to assist counsel with the litigation of this Action.
(g) Mock jurors who have signed an undertaking or agreement agreeing not to publicly disclosed Protected Material and to keep any information concerning Protected Material confidential. (h) Any mediator who is assigned to hear this matter, and his or her staff, subject to their agreement to maintain confidentiality to the same degree as required by this Protective Order; and
(i) The Court and its personnel.
8. A Party shall designate documents, information, or material as “CONFIDENTIAL” only upon a good faith belief that the documents, information, or material contains confidential or proprietary information or trade secrets of the Party or a Third Party to whom the Party reasonably believes it owes an obligation of confidentiality with respect to such documents, information, or material. 9. Documents, information, or material produced pursuant to any discovery request in this Action, including but not limited to Protected Material designated as DESIGNATED MATERIAL, shall be used by the Parties only in the litigation of this Action and shall not be used for any other purpose. Any person or entity who obtains access to DESIGNATED MATERIAL or the contents thereof pursuant to this Order shall not make any copies, duplicates, extracts, summaries, or descriptions of such DESIGNATED MATERIAL or any portion thereof except as may be reasonably necessary in the litigation of this Action. Any such copies, duplicates, extracts, summaries, or descriptions shall be classified DESIGNATED MATERIALS and subject to all of the terms and conditions of this Order. 10. To the extent a producing Party believes that certain Protected Material qualifying to be designated CONFIDENTIAL is so sensitive that its dissemination deserves even further limitation, the producing Party may designate such Protected Material “CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or to the extent such Protected Material includes computer source code and/or live data (that is, data as it exists residing in a database or databases) (“Source Code Material”), the producing Party may designate such Protected Material as “CONFIDENTIAL - SOURCE CODE.” 11. For Protected Material designated CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY, access to, and disclosure of, such Protected Material shall be limited to individuals listed in paragraphs 5(a–c) and (e–g); provided, however, that access by in-house counsel pursuant
to paragraph 5(c) be limited to in-house counsel who exercise no competitive decision- making authority on behalf of the client. 12. For Protected Material designated CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY, access to, and disclosure of, such Protected Material shall be limited to individuals listed in paragraphs 5(a–b) and (e–i); provided, however, that the designating Party shall accommodate reasonable requests to provide summary information to in-house counsel designated pursuant to paragraph 5(c) who exercise no competitive decision-making authority on behalf of the client and reasonably require access to such information. 13. For Protected Material designated CONFIDENTIAL - SOURCE CODE, the following additional restrictions apply:
(a) Access to a Party’s Source Code Material shall be provided only on “stand-alone” computer(s) (that is, the computer may not be linked to any network, including a local area network (“LAN”), an intranet or the Internet). The stand-alone computer(s) may be connected to (i) a printer, or (ii) a device capable of temporarily storing electronic copies solely for the limited purposes permitted pursuant to paragraphs 11(h and k) below. Additionally, except as provided in paragraph 11(k) below, the stand-alone computer(s) may only be located at the offices of the producing Party’s outside counsel or its vendors.
(b) The receiving Party shall make reasonable efforts to restrict its requests for such access to the stand-alone computer(s) to normal business hours, which for purposes of this paragraph shall be 8:00 a.m. through 6:00 p.m. However, upon reasonable notice from the receiving Party, the producing Party shall make reasonable efforts to accommodate the receiving Party’s request for access to the stand-alone computer(s) outside of normal business hours. The Parties agree to cooperate in good faith such that maintaining the producing Party’s Source Code Material at the offices of its outside counsel or its vendors shall not unreasonably hinder the receiving Party’s ability to efficiently and effectively conduct the prosecution or defense of this Action.
(c) The producing Party shall provide the receiving Party with information explaining how to start, log on to, and operate the stand-alone computer(s) in order to access the produced Source Code Material on the stand-alone computer(s).
(d) The producing Party will produce Source Code Material in computer searchable format on the stand-alone computer(s) as described above.
(e) Access to Source Code Material shall be limited to outside counsel and up to three (3) outside consultants or experts4 (i.e., not existing employees or affiliates of a Party or an affiliate of a Party or competitor identified by the Producing Party with reasonable specificity) retained for the purpose of this litigation and approved to access such Protected Materials pursuant to paragraph 5(e) above. A receiving Party may include excerpts of Source Code Material in an exhibit to a pleading, expert report, or deposition transcript (collectively, “Source Code Exhibits”), provided that the Source Code Exhibits are appropriately marked under this Order, restricted to those who are entitled to have access to them as specified herein, and, if filed with the Court, filed under seal in accordance with the Court’s rules, procedures, and orders.
(f) To the extent portions of Source Code Material are quoted in a Source Code Exhibit, either (1) the entire Source Code Exhibit will be stamped and treated as CONFIDENTIAL - SOURCE CODE or (2) those pages containing quoted Source Code Material will be separately stamped and treated as CONFIDENTIAL - SOURCE CODE.
(g) Except as set forth in paragraph 11(k) below, no electronic copies of Source Code Material shall be made without prior written consent of the producing Party, except as necessary to create documents that, pursuant to the Court’s rules, procedures, and order, must be filed or served electronically.
(h) The receiving Party shall be permitted to make a reasonable number of printouts and photocopies of Source Code Material, which shall presumptively be a total of ten (10), all of which shall be designated and clearly labeled “CONFIDENTIAL - SOURCE CODE,” and the receiving Party shall maintain a log of all such files that are printed or photocopied.
4 For the purposes of this paragraph, an outside consultant or expert is defined to include the outside consultant’s or expert’s direct reports and other support personnel, such that the disclosure to a consultant or expert who employs others within his or her firm to help in his or her analysis shall count as a disclosure to a single consultant or expert, provided that such personnel helping in the analysis of Source Code Material shall be disclosed pursuant to Paragraph 5(e). (i) Should such printouts or photocopies be permissibly transferred back to electronic media, such media shall be labeled “CONFIDENTIAL - SOURCE CODE” and shall continue to be treated as such.
(j) If the receiving Party’s outside counsel, consultants, or experts obtain printouts or photocopies of Source Code Material, the receiving Party shall ensure that such outside counsel, consultants, or experts keep the printouts or photocopies in a secured locked area in the offices of such outside counsel, consultants, or expert. The receiving Party may also temporarily keep the printouts or photocopies at: (i) the Court for any proceedings(s) relating to the Source Code Material, for the dates associated with the proceeding(s); (ii) the sites where any deposition(s) relating to the Source Code Material are taken, for the dates associated with the deposition(s); and (iii) any intermediate location reasonably necessary to transport the printouts or photocopies (e.g., a hotel prior to a Court proceeding or deposition).
(k) A producing Party’s Source Code Material may only be transported by the receiving Party at the direction of a person authorized under paragraph 11(e) above to another person authorized under paragraph 11(e) above on paper or removable electronic media (e.g., a DVD, CD-ROM, or flash memory “stick”) via hand carry, Federal Express, or other similarly reliable courier.
14. Any attorney representing a Party, whether in-house or outside counsel, and any person associated with a Party and permitted to receive the other Party’s Protected Material that is designated CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY, CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY, and/or CONFIDENTIAL - SOURCE CODE (collectively “HIGHLY SENSITIVE MATERIAL”), who obtains, receives, has access to, or otherwise learns, in whole or in part, the other Party’s HIGHLY SENSITIVE MATERIAL under this Order shall not prepare, prosecute, supervise, or assist in the preparation or prosecution of any patent application pertaining to the field of the invention of the patents-in-suit during the pendency of this Action and for one year after its conclusion, including any appeals. To ensure compliance with the purpose of this provision, each Party shall create an “Ethical Wall” between those persons with access to HIGHLY SENSITIVE MATERIAL and any individuals who prepare, prosecute, supervise or assist in the preparation or prosecution of any patent application pertaining to the field of invention of the patent-in-suit. Nothing in this Order shall prevent a person with access to HIGHLY SENSITIVE MATERIAL from participating in a PTO proceeding, e.g., IPR or PGR, except for that person shall not participate—directly or indirectly—in the amendment of
any claim(s). 15. Nothing in this Order shall be construed to prevent counsel from advising their clients with respect to this case based in whole or in part upon Protected Materials, provided counsel does not disclose the Protected Material itself except as provided in this Order. 16. Nothing in this Order shall require production of documents, information, or other material that a Party contends is protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege, the work product doctrine, or other privilege, doctrine, or immunity. If documents, information, or other material subject to a claim of attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine, or other privilege, doctrine, or immunity is inadvertently or unintentionally produced, such
production shall in no way prejudice or otherwise constitute a waiver of, or estoppel as to, any such privilege, doctrine, or immunity. Any Party that inadvertently or unintentionally produces documents, information, or other material it reasonably believes are protected under the attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine, or other privilege, doctrine, or immunity may obtain the return of such documents, information, or other material by promptly notifying the recipient(s) and providing a privilege log for the inadvertently or unintentionally produced documents, information, or other material. The recipient(s) shall gather and return all copies of such documents, information, or other material to the producing Party, except for any pages containing privileged or otherwise protected markings
by the recipient(s), which pages shall instead be destroyed and certified as such to the producing Party. 17. There shall be no disclosure of any DESIGNATED MATERIAL by any person authorized to have access thereto to any person who is not authorized for such access under this Order. The Parties are hereby ORDERED to safeguard all such documents, information, and
material to protect against disclosure to any unauthorized persons or entities. 18. Nothing contained herein shall be construed to prejudice any Party’s right to use any DESIGNATED MATERIAL in taking testimony at any deposition or hearing provided that the DESIGNATED MATERIAL is only disclosed to a person(s) who is: (i) eligible to have access to the DESIGNATED MATERIAL by virtue of his or her employment with the designating Party; (ii) identified in the DESIGNATED MATERIAL as an author, addressee, or copy recipient of such information; (iii) although not identified as an author, addressee, or copy recipient of such DESIGNATED MATERIAL, has, in the ordinary course of
business, seen such DESIGNATED MATERIAL; (iv) a current or former officer, director or employee of the producing Party or a current or former officer, director, or employee of a company affiliated with the producing Party; (v) counsel for a Party, including outside counsel and in-house counsel (subject to paragraph 9 of this Order); (vi) an independent contractor, consultant, and/or expert retained for the purpose of this litigation; (vii) court reporters and videographers; (viii) the Court; or (ix) other persons entitled hereunder to access to DESIGNATED MATERIAL. DESIGNATED MATERIAL shall not be disclosed to any other persons unless prior authorization is obtained from counsel representing the producing Party or from the Court.
19. Parties may, at the deposition or hearing or within thirty (30) days after receipt of a deposition or hearing transcript, designate the deposition or hearing transcript or any portion thereof as “CONFIDENTIAL,” “CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” “CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or “CONFIDENTIAL - SOURCE CODE” pursuant to this Order. Access to the deposition or hearing transcript so designated shall be limited in accordance with the terms of this Order. Until expiration of
the 30-day period, the entire deposition or hearing transcript shall be treated as CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY. 20. Any DESIGNATED MATERIAL that is filed with the Court shall be filed under seal and shall remain under seal until further order of the Court. The filing Party shall be responsible for informing the Clerk of the Court that the filing should be sealed and for placing the legend “FILED UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” above the caption and conspicuously on each page of the filing. Exhibits to a filing shall conform to the labeling requirements set forth in this Order. If a pretrial pleading filed with the
Court, or an exhibit thereto, discloses or relies on DESIGNATED MATERIAL, such confidential portions shall be redacted to the extent necessary and the pleading or exhibit filed publicly with the Court. 21. The Order applies to pretrial discovery. Nothing in this Order shall be deemed to prevent the Parties from introducing any DESIGNATED MATERIAL into evidence at the trial of this Action, or from using any information contained in DESIGNATED MATERIAL at the trial of this Action, subject to any pretrial order issued by this Court. 22. A Party may request in writing to the other Party that the designation given to any DESIGNATED MATERIAL be modified or withdrawn. If the designating Party does
not agree to re-designation within ten (10) days of receipt of the written request, the requesting Party may apply to the Court for relief. Upon any such application to the Court, the burden shall be on the designating Party to show why its classification is proper. Such application shall be treated procedurally as a motion to compel pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37, subject to the Rule’s provisions relating to sanctions. In making such application, the requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local
Rules of the Court shall be met. Pending the Court’s determination of the application, the designation of the designating Party shall be maintained. 23. Each outside consultant or expert to whom DESIGNATED MATERIAL is disclosed in accordance with the terms of this Order shall be advised by counsel of the terms of this Order, shall be informed that they are subject to the terms and conditions of this Order, and shall sign an acknowledgment that they have received a copy of, have read, and have agreed to be bound by this Order. A copy of the acknowledgment form is attached as Appendix A.
24. The parties agree that drafts of any expert report, declaration, or disclosure, including drafts of reports, as well as any notes made by experts, are protected work product and shall not be discoverable regardless of the form of the draft and notes, unless the expert relies on the aforementioned as a basis for his or her opinion and the information contained is not otherwise disclosed. The parties further agree that communications of any form relating to this action between (a) a party to these actions, a representative of a party, or the parties’ attorneys and (b) the parties’ expert(s), whether testifying or non-testifying, are protected work product and shall not be discoverable, except to the extent the communications identify facts, data, or assumptions that the parties’ attorneys provided
and that the expert(s) relied upon in forming any opinions expressed or to be expressed in an expert report or trial testimony and are not otherwise disclosed pursuant. 25. To the extent that any discovery is taken of persons who are not Parties to this Action (“Third Parties”) and in the event that such Third Parties contend the discovery sought involves trade secrets, confidential business information, or other proprietary information, then such Third Parties may agree to be bound by this Order.
26. To the extent that discovery or testimony is taken of Third Parties, the Third Parties may designate as “CONFIDENTIAL,” “CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or “CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” and/or “CONFIDENTIAL - SOURCE CODE” any documents, information, or other material, in whole or in part, produced by such Third Parties. The Third Parties shall have ten (10) days after production of such documents, information, or other materials to make such a designation. Until that time period lapses or until such a designation has been made, whichever occurs sooner, all documents, information, or other material so produced or given
shall be treated as “CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” in accordance with this Order. 27. Within ninety (90) days of final termination of this Action, including any appeals, all DESIGNATED MATERIAL, including all copies, duplicates, abstracts, indexes, summaries, descriptions, and excerpts or extracts thereof (excluding excerpts or extracts incorporated into any privileged memoranda of the Parties), shall at the producing Party’s election either be returned to the producing Party or be destroyed. The receiving Party shall verify the return or destruction by affidavit furnished to the producing Party, upon the producing Party’s request. Notwithstanding the provisions for return of Discovery
Material, outside counsel may retain one set of pleadings, correspondence and attorney and consultant work product (but not document productions) for archival purposes. 28. The failure to designate documents, information, or material in accordance with this Order and the failure to object to a designation at a given time shall not preclude the filing of a motion at a later date seeking to impose such designation or challenging the propriety thereof. The entry of this Order and/or the production of documents, information, or
material hereunder shall in no way constitute a waiver of any objection to the furnishing thereof, all such objections being hereby preserved. 29. Any Party knowing or believing that any other Party is in violation of or intends to violate this Order and has raised the question of violation or potential violation with the opposing Party and has been unable to resolve the matter by agreement may move the Court for such relief as may be appropriate in the circumstances. Pending disposition of the motion by the Court, the Party alleged to be in violation of or intending to violate this Order shall discontinue the performance of and/or shall not undertake the further performance of any
action alleged to constitute a violation of this Order. 30. Production of DESIGNATED MATERIAL by any Party shall not be deemed a publication of the documents, information, or material (or the contents thereof) produced so as to void or make voidable whatever claim the Parties may have as to the proprietary and confidential nature of the documents, information, or other material or its contents. 31. Nothing in this Order shall be construed to effect an abrogation, waiver, or limitation of any kind on the rights of each of the Parties to assert any applicable discovery or trial privilege. 32. If at any time Protected Material is subpoenaed by any court, arbitral, administrative, or
legislative body, the Party to whom the subpoena or other request is directed shall immediately give prompt written notice thereof to every Party who has produced such Discovery Material and to its counsel and shall provide each such Party with an opportunity to move for a protective order regarding the production of Protected Materials implicated by the subpoena. 33. A Party shall not be obligated to challenge the propriety of any designation of Protected Material under this Order at the time the designation 1s made, and a failure to do so shall not preclude a subsequent challenge thereto. 34. The inadvertent production by a Party of Discovery Material subject to the attorney-client privilege, work-product protection, or any other applicable privilege or protection will not waive the applicable privilege and/or protection if a request for return of such inadvertently produced Discovery Material is made promptly after the Producing Party learns of its inadvertent production. Upon a request from any Producing Party who has inadvertently produced Discovery Material that it believes is privileged and/or protected, each Receiving Party shall immediately destroy or return such Protected Material or Discovery Material and all copies to the Producing Party. Eachofthe Parties shall also retain the right to file a motion with the Court (a) to modify this Order to allow disclosure of DESIGNATED MATERIAL to additional persons or entities if reasonably necessary to prepare and present this Action; and (b) to apply for additional protection of DESIGNATED MATERIAL.
Entered this 12th day of April, 2022.
(Dees O\ac \ ALAN D ALBR: T UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION
Plaintiff, Case No. 6:21-cv-943-ADA
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD; JURY TRIAL DEMANDED SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.; and APPLE INC.
Defendant.
APPENDIX A UNDERTAKING OF EXPERTS OR CONSULTANTS REGARDING PROTECTIVE ORDER I, ___________________________________________, declare that:
1. My address is _________________________________________________________. My current employer is _________________________________________________. My current occupation is ________________________________________________. 2. I have received a copy of the Protective Order in this action. I have carefully read and understand the provisions of the Protective Order. 3. I will comply with all of the provisions of the Protective Order. I will hold in confidence, will not disclose to anyone not qualified under the Protective Order, and will use only for purposes of this action any information designated as “CONFIDENTIAL,” “CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” “CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or “CONFIDENTIAL - SOURCE CODE” that is disclosed to me. 4. Promptly upon termination of these actions, I will return all documents and things designated as “CONFIDENTIAL,” “CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” “CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or “CONFIDENTIAL - SOURCE CODE” that came into my possession, and all documents and things that I have
prepared relating thereto, to the outside counsel for the Party by whom I am employed. 5. I hereby submit to the jurisdiction of this Court for the purpose of enforcement of the Protective Order in this action. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Signature ________________________________________ Date ______________________________