ARIEL MINO v. PURE TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., etc.
This text of ARIEL MINO v. PURE TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., etc. (ARIEL MINO v. PURE TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed February 16, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D20-1711 Lower Tribunal No. 18-8597 ________________
Ariel Mino, Appellant,
vs.
Pure Technologies U.S., Inc., etc., et al., Appellees.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Mark Blumstein, Judge.
Somera & Silva, LLP, and Peter J. Somera, Jr., and Paul M. Silva, M.D. (Boca Raton); Fieger Law and Geoffrey N. Fieger (Southfield, MI); Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A., and Adam Richardson and Bard D. Rockenbach (West Palm Beach), for appellant.
Demahy Labrador Drake & Cabeza and Kenneth R. Drake and Pete L. Demahy and Orlando D. Cabeza, for appellee Pure Technologies U.S., Inc.
Before LOGUE, HENDON and LOBREE, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ARIEL MINO v. PURE TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., etc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ariel-mino-v-pure-technologies-us-inc-etc-fladistctapp-2022.