ARIEL MINO v. PURE TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 16, 2022·No. 20-1711·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed February 16, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D20-1711

Lower Tribunal No. 18-8597

Ariel Mino,

Appellant,

vs.

Pure Technologies U.S., Inc., etc., et al., Appellees.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Mark Blumstein, Judge.

Somera & Silva, LLP, and Peter J. Somera, Jr., and Paul M. Silva, M.D.

(Boca Raton); Fieger Law and Geoffrey N. Fieger (Southfield, MI); Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A., and Adam Richardson and Bard D. Rockenbach (West Palm Beach), for appellant.

Demahy Labrador Drake & Cabeza and Kenneth R. Drake and Pete L.

Demahy and Orlando D. Cabeza, for appellee Pure Technologies U.S., Inc.

Before LOGUE, HENDON and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ARIEL MINO v. PURE TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., etc., (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

ARIEL MINO v. PURE TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., etc. (ARIEL MINO v. PURE TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., etc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.