Ariel Anise Murphy v. 4253 Hunt Drive, LLC D/B/A Townhomes of Coyote Ridge

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 14, 2023
Docket02-23-00208-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Ariel Anise Murphy v. 4253 Hunt Drive, LLC D/B/A Townhomes of Coyote Ridge (Ariel Anise Murphy v. 4253 Hunt Drive, LLC D/B/A Townhomes of Coyote Ridge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ariel Anise Murphy v. 4253 Hunt Drive, LLC D/B/A Townhomes of Coyote Ridge, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-23-00208-CV ___________________________

ARIEL ANISE MURPHY, Appellant

V.

4253 HUNT DRIVE, LLC D/B/A TOWNHOMES OF COYOTE RIDGE, Appellee

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2 Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. CV2023-01529-JP

Before Womack, Wallach, and Walker, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On November 8, 2023, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed

as the appellate rules require.1 See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, on or before November 20, 2023,

appellant filed with the court an appellant’s brief and an accompanying motion

reasonably explaining the brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See

Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.

Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an

opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of

prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Delivered: December 14, 2023

1 In other correspondence with appellant, we notified her that her docketing statement had not been filed and directed her to file a docketing statement. See Tex. R. App. P. 32.1. Despite that correspondence, appellant has not filed a docketing statement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ariel Anise Murphy v. 4253 Hunt Drive, LLC D/B/A Townhomes of Coyote Ridge, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ariel-anise-murphy-v-4253-hunt-drive-llc-dba-townhomes-of-coyote-ridge-texapp-2023.