Arias v. Mukasey
This text of 309 F. App'x 148 (Arias v. Mukasey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Maria Luz Arias, Luis Mariano Dominguez-Arias, and Miriam Xóchitl Dominguez-Arias, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, Perez v. Mukasey, 516 F.3d 770, 773 (9th Cir.2008), we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Petitioners’ motion to reopen as untimely because the motion was filed more than 30 months after the BIA’s April 16, 2004 orders dismissing Petitioners’ underlying appeal. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2).
We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision not to invoke its sua sponte au[149]*149thority to reopen proceedings under 8 C.F.R. § 1008.2(a). See Ekimian v. INS, 803 F.3d 1153, 1159 (9th Cir.2002).
In light of our disposition, we do not reach Petitioners’ remaining contentions.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
309 F. App'x 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arias-v-mukasey-ca9-2009.