Arias-Paulino v. Academy Bus Tours, Inc.
This text of 48 A.D.3d 350 (Arias-Paulino v. Academy Bus Tours, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard R. Silver, J.), entered December 22, 2006, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendants’ motion to renew and reargue a prior motion to amend their answer to include the affirmative defenses of release and accord and satisfaction and, upon reargument, granted the prior motion and dismissed all plaintiffs’ claims up to $1,000,000, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, the motion denied and the claims reinstated.
It is undisputed that defendant Academy Bus Tours, Inc. received the release in July 2002 and did not move to amend its answer until approximately 2x/2 years later, in 2005, during which time plaintiffs not only litigated the matter extensively but also prepared for and participated in a mediation. Defendants’ motion to amend their answer should have been denied upon the ground of laches (see Noy v 765 9th Ave. Corp., 281 AD2d 232 [2001]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Gonzalez and McGuire, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 A.D.3d 350, 851 N.Y.S.2d 534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arias-paulino-v-academy-bus-tours-inc-nyappdiv-2008.