Ariana M. v. Eyesys Vision Inc. Plan

Fifth Circuit

Ariana M. v. Eyesys Vision Inc. Plan

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedJuly 10, 2017

Docket16-20174

StatusPublished

This text of Ariana M. v. Eyesys Vision Inc. Plan (Ariana M. v. Eyesys Vision Inc. Plan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ariana M. v. Eyesys Vision Inc. Plan, (5th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _____________________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED No. 16-20174 July 10, 2017 _____________________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk ARIANA M., Plaintiff – Appellant

versus

HUMANA HEALTH PLAN OF TEXAS, INCORPORATED, Defendant – Appellee

__________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston __________________________

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion April 21, 2017, 5 Cir., 2017, 854 F.3d 753)

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, JOLLY, JONES, SMITH, DENNIS, CLEMENT, PRADO, OWEN, ELROD, SOUTHWICK, HAYNES, GRAVES, HIGGINSON and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI