Aria Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Aria Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 726 F.3d 1296 →

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided July 24, 2012·No. 2012-1531·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 12-1531 Document:8 Pagezl Filed: 07124/2012

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

waiter: States Qtnurt of appeals for the jfeheral @irtuit

ARIA DIAGNOSTICS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,

V.

SEQUENOM, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

2012-1531 -

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in case no. 11-CV-6391, Judge Susan Illston.

0N MOTION

ORDER

Sequenom, Inc. moves to expedite the brieﬁng sched- ule, oral argument, and disposition of this appeal. Seque- nom states that Aria Diagnostics, Inc. opposes.

Sequenom may of coarse self-expedite the case by ﬁl- ing its own briefs early. Sequenom has not shown that other deadlines should be shortened.

Accordingly,

Case: 124.531 Document: 8

IT Is ORDERED THAT:

The motion is denied.

JUL 2 4 2012 Date

cc: Michael J. Malecek, Esq. David I. Gindler, Esq.

Page: 2 Filed: 07/24/2012

FOR THE COURT

Isl Jan Horbalx Jan Horbaly

Clerk

FILED

u.s. COURT OF APPEALS FOR

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT JUL 2 4 2012

JAN HORBALY CLERK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Case: 12-1531 Document:8 Pagezl Filed: 07124/2012

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

waiter: States Qtnurt of appeals for the jfeheral @irtuit

ARIA DIAGNOSTICS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,

V.

SEQUENOM, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

2012-1531 -

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in case no. 11-CV-6391, Judge Susan Illston.

0N MOTION

ORDER

Sequenom, Inc. moves to expedite the brieﬁng sched- ule, oral argument, and disposition of this appeal. Seque- nom states that Aria Diagnostics, Inc. opposes.

Sequenom may of coarse self-expedite the case by ﬁl- ing its own briefs early. Sequenom has not shown that other deadlines should be shortened.

Accordingly,

Case: 124.531 Document: 8

IT Is ORDERED THAT:

The motion is denied.

JUL 2 4 2012 Date

cc: Michael J. Malecek, Esq. David I. Gindler, Esq.

Page: 2 Filed: 07/24/2012

FOR THE COURT

Isl Jan Horbalx Jan Horbaly

Clerk

FILED

u.s. COURT OF APPEALS FOR

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT JUL 2 4 2012

JAN HORBALY CLERK

Aria Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Aria Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc. (Aria Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.