Argue v. Argue
This text of Argue v. Argue (Argue v. Argue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0000506 21-MAR-2014 08:30 AM
SCWC-12-0000506
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
BRADLEY JOHN ARGUE, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
BONDU KONDEH ARGUE, Respondent/Defendant-Appellant.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0000506; FC-D NO. 10-1-252K)
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ. and Circuit Judge Lee, in place of Acoba, J., recused)
Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee’s Application for Writ of
Certiorari, filed on February 10, 2014, is hereby rejected.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, March 21, 2014.
Daniel S. Peters /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Randal K.O. Lee
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Argue v. Argue, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/argue-v-argue-haw-2014.