Argot v. Cheney
1 N.C. 71
This text of 1 N.C. 71 (Argot v. Cheney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Argot v. Cheney, 1 N.C. 71 (circtnc 1793).
Opinion
It seems well: for if the frank tenements be in one, although there be several lessees for years; entry on an acre, in the namer of the whole is well.
Bridgeman. Still he ought to prove the entry of the lessees in all the parcels.
But at last they were able to prove the entry of the attorney, and the lessees in all the parcels. Postea, p. 82. Palm. 402, 405, Noy 77.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 N.C. 71, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/argot-v-cheney-circtnc-1793.