Argos Resources, Inc. v. Merritt

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Argos Resources, Inc. v. Merritt

446 So. 2d 1123, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12069

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 28, 1984

DocketNo. 83-1773

StatusPublished

This text of 446 So. 2d 1123 (Argos Resources, Inc. v. Merritt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Argos Resources, Inc. v. Merritt, 446 So. 2d 1123, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12069 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The sole point for our consideration in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying appellants’ motions to quash service of process, to dismiss for insufficiency of service of process and to dismiss for lack of personal service.

Our review of the record on appeal and the briefs fails to show that the trial court erred in its ruling denying the motions to dismiss. See Castellanos v. Hialeah-Miami Springs First State Bank, 330 So.2d 100 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 341 So.2d 1080 (Fla.1976); Allstate Insurance Co. v. Royal Guardian Insurance Co. of Canada, 314 So.2d 14 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975).

The record clearly demonstrates that the order appealed should be affirmed upon the grounds that the service was legally sufficient under both section 48.161, Florida Statutes (1981), see Cortez Development Co. v. New York Capital Group, Inc., 401 So.2d 1163 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), and section 48.181, Florida Statutes (1981), see Horace v. American National Bank and Trust Co. of Fort Lauderdale, 251 So.2d 33 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI