Argo v. State

1923 OK CR 127, 214 P. 1085, 23 Okla. Crim. 369, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 212
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided May 19, 1923·No. No. A-4047.·Published

Opinion

MATSON, P. J.

Plaintiff in error, George D. Argo, was convicted iin the district court of Caddoi county at the February term, 1921, of the crime above stated and punishment' fixed as above stated. From such judgment of conviction he appeals to this court.

The Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that a parole has been granted by the Governor and accepted by the plaintiff in error. A copy of the parole and thel acceptance thereof by plaintiff in error is attached to the motion tol dismiss this appeal. When a parole is granted and accepted, and notice of that fact is brought to the attention of this 'court pending the appeal, the appeal will be dismissed. Noret v. State, 15 Okla. Cr. 574, 179 Pac. 617; Ernst v. State, 17 Okla. Cr. 282, 187 Pac. 930; Brown v. State, 16 Okla. Cr. 505, 184 Pac. 912.

*370 The appeal herein is therefore dismissed, and the cause remanded to the district court of Caddo county.

DOYLE and BESSEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Argo v. State, 1923 OK CR 127, 214 P. 1085, 23 Okla. Crim. 369, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 212 (Okla. Ct. App. 1923).

1923 OK CR 127 (Argo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. State
1919 OK CR 306 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1919)
Ernst v. State
1920 OK CR 51 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1920)
Noret v. State
1919 OK CR 81 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1919)