Argila v. Manhattan Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Argila v. Manhattan Life Insurance

50 A.D.2d 568, 375 N.Y.S.2d 843, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12324

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 10, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 50 A.D.2d 568 (Argila v. Manhattan Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Argila v. Manhattan Life Insurance, 50 A.D.2d 568, 375 N.Y.S.2d 843, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12324 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— The respective attorneys on these appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated July 7, 1975, and a judgment of said court entered September 10, 1975, after a conference in this court before Mr. Justice Gittleson on October 10, 1975, signed a stipulation that (1) said order and judgment be vacated, (2) a certain check shall be held in escrow by plaintiff’s attorney until final determination of the action as to the interpleaded defendant and (3) the trial shall proceed upon note of issue by plaintiff. In accordance with the foregoing, the order and judgment appealed from are reversed, without costs, and the action shall proceed to trial as to the interpleaded defendant, upon note of issue by plaintiff. Gulotta, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Martuscello and Latham, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— The respective attorneys on these appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated July 7, 1975, and a judgment of said court entered September 10, 1975, after a conference in this court before Mr. Justice Gittleson on October 10, 1975, signed a stipulation that (1) said order and judgment be vacated, (2) a certain check shall be held in escrow by plaintiff’s attorney until final determination of the action as to the interpleaded defendant and (3) the trial shall proceed upon note of issue by plaintiff. In accordance with the foregoing, the order and judgment appealed from are reversed, without costs, and the action shall proceed to trial as to the interpleaded defendant, upon note of issue by plaintiff. Gulotta, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Martuscello and Latham, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 568, 375 N.Y.S.2d 843, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/argila-v-manhattan-life-insurance-nyappdiv-1975.