Argentieri v. Fischer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Argentieri v. Fischer

68 A.D.3d 1432, 889 N.Y.2d 879

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Argentieri v. Fischer. Read the opinion of the Court — 87 A.D.3d 1242 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 17, 2009·Published

Opinion

Petitioner commenced this proceeding challenging a tier III disciplinary determination finding him guilty of providing unauthorized legal assistance to another inmate. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the administrative determination at issue has been reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Accordingly, inasmuch as petitioner has been afforded all the relief to which he is entitled, this matter is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Robertson v Bezio, 65 AD3d 771, 771 [2009]).

Cardona, EJ, Mercure, Lahtinen, Kane and Garry, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petitioner commenced this proceeding challenging a tier III disciplinary determination finding him guilty of providing unauthorized legal assistance to another inmate. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the administrative determination at issue has been reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Accordingly, inasmuch as petitioner has been afforded all the relief to which he is entitled, this matter is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Robertson v Bezio, 65 AD3d 771, 771 [2009]).

Cardona, EJ, Mercure, Lahtinen, Kane and Garry, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Argentieri v. Fischer, 68 A.D.3d 1432, 889 N.Y.2d 879 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

68 A.D.3d 1432 (Argentieri v. Fischer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related