Argenti v. State

427 So. 2d 363, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20812
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 2, 1983
DocketNo. 82-1598
StatusPublished

This text of 427 So. 2d 363 (Argenti v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Argenti v. State, 427 So. 2d 363, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20812 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

BERANEK, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of burglary and aggravated assault after his bare-bones motion for judgment of acquittal was denied. Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.380(b) requires that such a motion fully set forth the grounds on which it is based. See also Patterson v. State, 391 So.2d 344 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). Although a review of the record discloses that appellant may have had certain persuasive legal arguments, we are foreclosed from entertaining them because they were not properly raised below. The conviction is thus affirmed. The remedy, if any, is via Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

AFFIRMED.

LETTS, C.J., and DELL, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Patterson v. State
391 So. 2d 344 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
427 So. 2d 363, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/argenti-v-state-fladistctapp-1983.