Argenti v. State
This text of 427 So. 2d 363 (Argenti v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of burglary and aggravated assault after his bare-bones motion for judgment of acquittal was denied. Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.380(b) requires that such a motion fully set forth the grounds on which it is based. See also Patterson v. State, 391 So.2d 344 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). Although a review of the record discloses that appellant may have had certain persuasive legal arguments, we are foreclosed from entertaining them because they were not properly raised below. The conviction is thus affirmed. The remedy, if any, is via Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
427 So. 2d 363, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/argenti-v-state-fladistctapp-1983.