Argenio v. Cushman & Wakefield, Inc.
This text of 246 A.D.2d 615 (Argenio v. Cushman & Wakefield, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Otis Elevator Company appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.), dated December [616]*61627, 1996, which denied its motion pursuant to CPLR 3215 and 3216 for leave to enter a default judgment on its cross claim against the defendant Cushman & Wakefield, Inc.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion of the defendant Otis Elevator Company for leave to enter a default judgment on its cross claim against the defendant Cushman & Wakefield, Inc., is granted.
Since the pleadings of Cushman & Wakefield, Inc., have previously been stricken pursuant to CPLR 3126 (see, Argenio v Cushman & Wakefield, 227 AD2d 578), the court should have granted the motion of Otis Elevator Company for leave to enter a default judgment on its cross claim (see, Curiale v Ardra Ins. Co., 88 NY2d 268, 279; Rokina Opt. Co. v Camera King, 63 NY2d 728, 730; Vierya v Briggs & Stratton Corp., 184 AD2d 766, 768). Rosenblatt, J. P., O’Brien, Thompson, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
246 A.D.2d 615, 667 N.Y.S.2d 307, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/argenio-v-cushman-wakefield-inc-nyappdiv-1998.