Arevalo v. State

890 So. 2d 537, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 61, 2005 WL 171328
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 7, 2005
DocketNo. 5D04-135
StatusPublished

This text of 890 So. 2d 537 (Arevalo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arevalo v. State, 890 So. 2d 537, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 61, 2005 WL 171328 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no merit in Luis Humberto Arevalo’s appeal of his convictions for sexual battery with a deadly weapon, sexual battery with threat of injury, and kidnapping with intent to commit a felony, and affirm. We also affirm the trial court’s order declaring Arevalo to be a sexual predator, and in doing so certify conflict with Espindola v. State, 855 So.2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).

AFFIRMED. CONFLICT CERTIFIED.

PETERSON, GRIFFIN and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Espindola v. State
855 So. 2d 1281 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
890 So. 2d 537, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 61, 2005 WL 171328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arevalo-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.