Arevalo v. State
890 So. 2d 537, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 61, 2005 WL 171328
Opinion
We find no merit in Luis Humberto Arevalo’s appeal of his convictions for sexual battery with a deadly weapon, sexual battery with threat of injury, and kidnapping with intent to commit a felony, and affirm. We also affirm the trial court’s order declaring Arevalo to be a sexual predator, and in doing so certify conflict with Espindola v. State, 855 So.2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).
AFFIRMED. CONFLICT CERTIFIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Arevalo v. State, 890 So. 2d 537, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 61, 2005 WL 171328 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
890 So. 2d 537 (Arevalo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Espindola v. State
855 So. 2d 1281 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)